ICLRPD (of sorts)

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #214,997 by jb4 7/15/05 12:09:09 PM Reply	ICLRPD (of sorts) This god entity set this up deliberately.[...] What a wanker! However, this probably needs to stay in this forum...could be toxic to a wider audience. jb4 shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub* + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf.* BULLSHIT
Post #215,829 by warmachine 7/20/05 6:31:17 PM Reply	Toxic meme? That makes me think of an RPG supplement titled 'Transhuman Space: Toxic Memes'. I don't think the idea that the biblical god is a wanker according to his own PR should be contained. I say this meme could liberate the gullible out there, not destroy them. Let's see the countervailing ideas. Let's see this god appear on daytime TV explaining why ignorance and torture are good for us. Matthew Greet Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol, and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pishing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked up brats you spawned to replace yourself. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin? - Mark Renton, Trainspotting.
Post #215,937 by jb4 7/21/05 3:08:41 PM Reply	Much rather see Him on Meet the Press... (For you Brits and other non-colonials, "Meet the Press" is a Sunday talking heads show where Big High Muckymucks sit across the table from somebody who is ostensibly a Journalist, and said Journalist tosses softball questions allowing said Muckymuck to completely ignore those questions and instead pontificate on His Very Important Thoughts on Nothing Important, or start laying the groundwork for Muckymuck's next election campaign. I hope that clears things up a bit.) jb4 shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub* + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf.* BULLSHIT
Post #215,992 by Ashton 7/21/05 7:50:23 PM Reply	Naaah.. they'uns jes Love___the George Burns \ufffd\ufffdolksy model.

How cloying is that? - (rcareaga) - (73) - July 14, 2005, 03:25:09 PM EDT

Aaah! Now I need a sponge for the monitor! -NT - (tuberculosis) - July 14, 2005, 01:31:24 PM EDT

Credit where due.. - (Ashton) - July 14, 2005, 06:13:22 PM EDT

Ooh! Atheism! - (warmachine) - (23) - July 18, 2005, 02:29:21 PM EDT

You're just being a spoilsport. - (Ashton) - July 15, 2005, 06:34:32 AM EDT

ICLRPD (of sorts) - (jb4) - (3) - July 15, 2005, 12:09:09 PM EDT

Toxic meme? - (warmachine) - (2) - July 20, 2005, 06:31:17 PM EDT

Much rather see Him on Meet the Press... - (jb4) - July 21, 2005, 03:08:41 PM EDT

Naaah.. they'uns jes Love___the George Burns \ufffd\ufffdolksy model. -NT - (Ashton) - July 21, 2005, 07:50:23 PM EDT

I just wonder where you learned your theology - (Arkadiy) - (17) - July 21, 2005, 09:50:18 PM EDT

What am I getting wrong, then? -NT - (warmachine) - (16) - July 26, 2005, 11:26:17 AM EDT

Re: What am I getting wrong, then? - (Arkadiy) - (15) - Aug. 3, 2005, 07:47:58 AM EDT

Lame excuses - (warmachine) - (14) - Aug. 3, 2005, 09:18:56 AM EDT

"I would have started with lasers, eight o'clock, day one." - (imric) - (1) - Aug. 3, 2005, 09:50:06 AM EDT

Well, yes! - (warmachine) - Aug. 3, 2005, 11:31:03 AM EDT

Love. It._____but Point of Order flag, anyway - - (Ashton) - (1) - Aug. 5, 2005, 04:44:29 AM EDT

Yes, yes! I know most believers see the bible as metaphor. - (warmachine) - Aug. 5, 2005, 05:57:56 AM EDT

None so blind as those who won't see - (Arkadiy) - (9) - Aug. 6, 2005, 08:56:35 PM EDT

I'll explain it in terms he can understand - (boxley) - (2) - Aug. 6, 2005, 08:50:15 PM EDT

Prefer a mad scientist idea - (warmachine) - (1) - Aug. 6, 2005, 10:58:44 PM EDT

that last frame......sez it all -NT - (boxley) - Aug. 7, 2005, 12:16:44 AM EDT

Seems as if Core Functions ___ were outsourced. - (Ashton) - Aug. 6, 2005, 10:31:44 PM EDT

Intellect without capacity for evil? - (warmachine) - (3) - Aug. 6, 2005, 10:37:29 PM EDT

I have met intellect without the capacity for evil - (boxley) - (2) - Aug. 7, 2005, 12:20:16 AM EDT

Capacity or choice - (warmachine) - (1) - Aug. 7, 2005, 05:32:22 AM EDT

Hey, warfarin - sometimes 'logic' Is enough! - (Ashton) - Aug. 7, 2005, 07:55:40 PM EDT

My $0.02 on the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Aug. 7, 2005, 12:44:03 AM EDT

Ooooh this is going to get good! - (imqwerky) - (10) - July 15, 2005, 09:56:48 PM EDT

Do you think that the Pope approves of your theology? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (9) - July 16, 2005, 01:18:17 AM EDT

The Pope just issued a warning about Harry Potter - (bionerd) - (2) - July 16, 2005, 09:26:46 AM EDT

He may soon issue a letter of support. - (Another Scott) - July 16, 2005, 09:46:56 AM EDT

Oh Brother! - (imqwerky) - July 16, 2005, 12:37:43 PM EDT

I don't care if the pope approves - (imqwerky) - (3) - July 16, 2005, 12:26:59 PM EDT

About what I guessed. :-) -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - July 16, 2005, 11:09:18 PM EDT

OT - (imqwerky) - (1) - July 17, 2005, 12:27:55 AM EDT

Replied -NT - (ben_tilly) - July 17, 2005, 02:54:41 AM EDT

Do you think she **cares** what the Pope thinks - (jb4) - (1) - July 18, 2005, 11:48:56 AM EDT

Theoretically she should - she's Catholic -NT - (ben_tilly) - July 18, 2005, 03:14:57 PM EDT

You missed the point - (Nightowl) - (35) - July 19, 2005, 11:06:23 AM EDT

And you missed his: It was still pretty awfully cloying. - (CRConrad) - (34) - July 19, 2005, 02:26:00 PM EDT

If I missed his, what was it? - (Nightowl) - (33) - July 20, 2005, 12:00:59 PM EDT

That's not smart, that's pathological - (drewk) - (27) - July 20, 2005, 12:13:03 PM EDT

Re: That's not smart, that's pathological - (Nightowl) - (26) - July 21, 2005, 02:09:02 AM EDT

How the fucking fuck can you NOT get it? - (CRConrad) - (10) - July 21, 2005, 03:32:42 AM EDT

Re: How the fucking fuck can you NOT get it? - (Nightowl) - (9) - July 21, 2005, 11:26:50 PM EDT

Nice rant - (tuberculosis) - (2) - July 21, 2005, 05:51:09 PM EDT

Re: Nice rant - (Nightowl) - (1) - July 21, 2005, 06:17:20 PM EDT

Do what I do. - (inthane-chan) - July 21, 2005, 06:39:00 PM EDT

Cloying; similar to "I think you're being too Pollyanna-ish" - (Silverlock) - (1) - July 21, 2005, 09:54:22 PM EDT

Re: ...similar to "I think you're being too Pollyanna-ish" - (Nightowl) - July 21, 2005, 10:54:03 PM EDT

you almost got cstrated I need to have a long talk with john - (boxley) - (3) - July 21, 2005, 11:11:30 PM EDT

John read it already and laughed! - (Nightowl) - (2) - July 21, 2005, 11:25:06 PM EDT

female rotor router, no clit no parteey - (boxley) - (1) - July 22, 2005, 12:11:53 AM EDT

Hahaha - (Nightowl) - July 22, 2005, 12:18:36 AM EDT

You're mixing terms. - (Another Scott) - (14) - July 21, 2005, 08:18:25 AM EDT

Hmmm, trying to get it - (Nightowl) - (13) - July 21, 2005, 05:15:31 PM EDT

Brenda, in this case: they're (mostly) Fucked, y'know? - (Ashton) - (12) - July 21, 2005, 07:27:05 PM EDT

PS - that Word thing... again - (Ashton) - (2) - July 21, 2005, 08:34:50 PM EDT

Re: PS - that Word thing... again - (Nightowl) - (1) - July 21, 2005, 11:23:18 PM EDT

{chortle} - (Ashton) - July 21, 2005, 11:50:53 PM EDT

Re: Brenda, in this case: they're (mostly) Fucked, y'know? - (Nightowl) - (8) - July 21, 2005, 11:08:32 PM EDT

Oblig {blush} - (Ashton) - July 22, 2005, 12:08:32 AM EDT

FOR "INSERT DIETY HRE!!!!!! - (boxley) - (1) - July 22, 2005, 12:20:40 AM EDT

As the dentist said... - (broomberg) - July 22, 2005, 06:35:39 AM EDT

Your denial confirms it - (drewk) - (4) - July 22, 2005, 12:06:36 PM EDT

Re: Your denial confirms it - (Nightowl) - (1) - July 22, 2005, 12:39:14 PM EDT

Free clue - (pwhysall) - July 22, 2005, 05:56:23 PM EDT

**could be**?!? - (jb4) - (1) - July 22, 2005, 03:37:28 PM EDT

IthinkI'mgoingintomymind -NT - (Ashton) - July 22, 2005, 05:52:31 PM EDT

cloying is extreme clinging with mucho annoying -NT - (boxley) - (1) - July 20, 2005, 12:48:23 PM EDT

Say what? - (Nightowl) - July 21, 2005, 02:11:18 AM EDT

It was A:How cloying (=sickeningly sweet);B:How stupid! HTH. -NT - (CRConrad) - (2) - July 20, 2005, 03:53:44 PM EDT

Nope, doesn't help - (Nightowl) - (1) - July 21, 2005, 02:12:34 AM EDT

That would be because of point B then. -NT - (CRConrad) - July 21, 2005, 03:05:49 AM EDT

iwethey.org

Worth getting into a flame war on the New York Times crossword blog.
100 ms