IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
News Picks Forum
/
*tilt*
Post #212,749
by
mmoffitt
6/27/05 5:50:30 PM
Reply
*tilt*
bcnu,
Mikem
It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
forget f*** the police, police can now f*** you
- (
andread
)
- (98)
- June 27, 2005, 12:14:56 PM EDT
NRA has been pointing that out for years
- (
drewk
)
- (97)
- June 27, 2005, 12:41:24 PM EDT
Why sorry?
-NT
- (
imric
)
- (2)
- June 27, 2005, 01:31:56 PM EDT
For passing up a golden opportunity to not make a bad pun
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- June 27, 2005, 01:43:26 PM EDT
Ah....
- (
imric
)
- June 27, 2005, 02:34:45 PM EDT
Amendment 2 grants
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (93)
- June 27, 2005, 02:30:26 PM EDT
Once again, look up Militia.
- (
imric
)
- (40)
- June 27, 2005, 02:42:42 PM EDT
Indiana National Guard, Illinois National Guard, etc. HTH
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- June 27, 2005, 03:03:45 PM EDT
Nope. Insist all you like.
- (
imric
)
- (1)
- June 27, 2005, 03:07:07 PM EDT
*tilt*
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 27, 2005, 05:50:30 PM EDT
Since defn # 3 there is by definition not able to be...
- (
CRConrad
)
- (36)
- June 27, 2005, 03:13:24 PM EDT
What was the definition of "militia" when it was written?
- (
drewk
)
- (35)
- June 27, 2005, 03:26:45 PM EDT
Defn 2 seems to point to National Guard. NG != Regular Army.
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (34)
- June 27, 2005, 04:11:04 PM EDT
A militia = citizen soldiers
- (
Silverlock
)
- (33)
- June 27, 2005, 04:38:03 PM EDT
If Amendment 2 concerned private ownership, ...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (32)
- June 27, 2005, 05:52:30 PM EDT
Show me where it says "State militia"
- (
drewk
)
- (31)
- June 27, 2005, 05:54:54 PM EDT
Please see Miller, 1938.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (30)
- June 28, 2005, 11:56:06 AM EDT
miller has nothing to do with states rights,
- (
boxley
)
- (29)
- June 28, 2005, 01:02:14 PM EDT
Nice parsing. Missed the intent of the ruling entirely.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (28)
- June 28, 2005, 01:05:46 PM EDT
Yeah, it says just what the Box said it says.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:08:57 PM EDT
Strictly to do with concealed weapons.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:17:42 PM EDT
dont see the word "state run" anywhere in there
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (24)
- June 28, 2005, 01:22:26 PM EDT
Whose "militia" is it?
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (23)
- June 28, 2005, 01:26:14 PM EDT
Why, THE PEOPLE'S, of course.
- (
imric
)
- (21)
- June 28, 2005, 01:34:16 PM EDT
You're almost there.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (20)
- June 28, 2005, 03:03:27 PM EDT
It was a tweak, son. I say, a tweak.
- (
imric
)
- (19)
- June 28, 2005, 03:30:58 PM EDT
It is a right to collectively protect a State.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (18)
- June 28, 2005, 03:54:42 PM EDT
And the way to do it is for people to KEEP and BEAR arms.
- (
imric
)
- (17)
- June 28, 2005, 04:11:55 PM EDT
My last on this. And I don't think you can argue this point.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (16)
- June 28, 2005, 05:16:23 PM EDT
I think you're wrong about this.
- (
Another Scott
)
- June 28, 2005, 05:59:13 PM EDT
Sure I can.
- (
imric
)
- (14)
- June 28, 2005, 08:18:42 PM EDT
By all means.. Go For It
- (
Ashton
)
- (13)
- June 28, 2005, 09:49:30 PM EDT
Funny, Ash.
- (
imric
)
- (12)
- June 28, 2005, 11:10:53 PM EDT
in a pinch Ashton is not unarmed, he just regrets the need
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (11)
- June 28, 2005, 11:25:17 PM EDT
Regrets the need?
- (
imric
)
- (10)
- June 29, 2005, 12:58:05 AM EDT
You aren't really going to get it, are you?
- (
Ashton
)
- (9)
- June 29, 2005, 02:33:24 AM EDT
Silly boy.
- (
imric
)
- (8)
- June 29, 2005, 07:09:04 AM EDT
{chortle} Thanks for playing.
- (
Ashton
)
- (7)
- June 29, 2005, 05:04:10 PM EDT
For Ash, the word "succinct" is blasphemy
- (
Silverlock
)
- (6)
- June 29, 2005, 09:40:48 PM EDT
simple he scratches his arse
- (
boxley
)
- (3)
- June 29, 2005, 09:48:02 PM EDT
For Box, the word "clarity", no, I won't do it.
-NT
- (
Silverlock
)
- (2)
- June 29, 2005, 09:56:45 PM EDT
Dude, you just did
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- June 29, 2005, 10:42:33 PM EDT
Is your it, his it?
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- June 29, 2005, 10:47:44 PM EDT
[Gawd] + [Guns] = will never a sonnet make. (The VB version)
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- June 29, 2005, 11:54:10 PM EDT
Silverlock, when you get Ash and Box in a debate...
- (
jb4
)
- June 30, 2005, 11:16:54 AM EDT
Militia is the same as Posse
- (
boxley
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:44:49 PM EDT
So they defined what arms are covered
- (
drewk
)
- June 28, 2005, 02:12:54 PM EDT
Miller decision is as valid as USSC elect bush decision
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (51)
- June 27, 2005, 02:43:38 PM EDT
Hardly.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (50)
- June 27, 2005, 03:03:05 PM EDT
so the militia helping the border guards
- (
boxley
)
- (49)
- June 27, 2005, 03:38:23 PM EDT
Those are your prime examples of *well-regulated* militias?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (48)
- June 27, 2005, 04:10:00 PM EDT
certainly they are well regulated, by members
- (
boxley
)
- (47)
- June 27, 2005, 04:16:37 PM EDT
That's why they call themselves eg: Michigan Militia
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (46)
- June 27, 2005, 04:27:24 PM EDT
That's a private (non-State Sanctioned) group.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (45)
- June 27, 2005, 05:53:53 PM EDT
Amendment 2 doesn't say "state sanctioned"
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (44)
- June 27, 2005, 06:10:42 PM EDT
Amendment 2 concerns States' Rights.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (43)
- June 28, 2005, 11:55:25 AM EDT
Nope. Wrong again.
- (
imric
)
- (9)
- June 28, 2005, 12:39:05 PM EDT
Nice try. It's *YOU* that needs an amendment.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 28, 2005, 12:59:52 PM EDT
Any non-contorted reading of that sentence . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (7)
- June 28, 2005, 01:04:21 PM EDT
No.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:07:33 PM EDT
Also...
- (
pwhysall
)
- (5)
- June 28, 2005, 01:13:59 PM EDT
Well, a case could be made . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2005, 01:24:52 PM EDT
Re: Well, a case could be made . .
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2005, 07:21:39 PM EDT
I think crew served weapons would not be in order
- (
boxley
)
- June 28, 2005, 07:42:39 PM EDT
you can own artillery, and use it on special occasions
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2005, 01:42:51 PM EDT
My uncle has a "3 pounder".
- (
Another Scott
)
- June 28, 2005, 02:07:35 PM EDT
You're reaching.
- (
admin
)
- (32)
- June 28, 2005, 12:57:55 PM EDT
So, I, the ENTIRE legal community and the USSC are wrong.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (31)
- June 28, 2005, 01:00:23 PM EDT
Entire Legal community? hardly
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (6)
- June 28, 2005, 01:03:08 PM EDT
*blam* *VRRRROooooommmmm....*
-NT
- (
pwhysall
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:04:33 PM EDT
Find a respected law journal that argues the NRA's position.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (4)
- June 28, 2005, 01:08:02 PM EDT
Lawyers have a very obvious agenda.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2005, 01:20:51 PM EDT
I never suggested they did.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:25:50 PM EDT
US Justice Department? Oh you said respected :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:23:32 PM EDT
howabout the 1857 supreme court?
- (
boxley
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:49:49 PM EDT
Miller was about *concealed* weapons.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (23)
- June 28, 2005, 01:19:37 PM EDT
Transport of a sawed-off shotgun.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (22)
- June 28, 2005, 01:24:37 PM EDT
Er, yes. A concealed weapon. Your point?
-NT
- (
admin
)
- June 28, 2005, 01:48:56 PM EDT
And you'll notice
- (
bepatient
)
- (4)
- June 28, 2005, 02:09:06 PM EDT
You, Scott and the NRA, right?
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- June 28, 2005, 03:04:46 PM EDT
I'm not an NRA member.
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2005, 04:46:59 PM EDT
See my last. You are, once again, wrong. ;0)
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2005, 05:17:11 PM EDT
Oh, I don't think so.
- (
bepatient
)
- June 28, 2005, 10:11:57 PM EDT
apparently you can roll your own machine guns now
- (
boxley
)
- (15)
- June 28, 2005, 02:21:11 PM EDT
Don't hold your breath.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (14)
- June 28, 2005, 03:08:37 PM EDT
You realize that was the intent, right?
- (
drewk
)
- (13)
- June 28, 2005, 03:17:47 PM EDT
Wrong. But it's pointless to argue this anymore. ;0)
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2005, 03:53:40 PM EDT
yes you are...and yes it is.
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- June 28, 2005, 04:49:53 PM EDT
In many ways the whole thing is a Grand Diversion - << \ufffd >>-
- (
Ashton
)
- (10)
- June 28, 2005, 05:34:52 PM EDT
Not a toughie.
- (
Yendor
)
- June 28, 2005, 05:44:10 PM EDT
heck, the only gun I ever need,,, is your gun
- (
boxley
)
- June 28, 2005, 06:59:07 PM EDT
I should have fled when I had the chance.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 29, 2005, 10:08:52 AM EDT
Follow your pyramid.
- (
bepatient
)
- (6)
- June 29, 2005, 10:33:15 AM EDT
Maslow builds pyramids
- (
Ashton
)
- (5)
- June 29, 2005, 05:23:21 PM EDT
ROFL!
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 29, 2005, 05:25:00 PM EDT
Point well ignored, I see.
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- June 29, 2005, 09:30:32 PM EDT
Hardly missed. Different priorities on my pyramid.
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- (2)
- June 30, 2005, 12:09:20 AM EDT
I keep forgetting
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- June 30, 2005, 01:56:09 PM EDT
I keep remembering
- (
Ashton
)
- June 30, 2005, 04:14:55 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
The parity bit is a bit that detects an error in itself 1/9th of the time.
381 ms