contest du jour.

No argument with her depiction of the '70s scene , the hopes of most women involved - and the utter banality of the males (suited or jeaned). I vas dere Charlie, too.

But to imagine that the entire issue of Roe V. Wade is about, some mere standard-uncommittable male playground - is so simplistic it mars her other pithy sequiturs. IMO.

Sanctimony about dead sperm (only a miniscule 1 E-11th of which ever lead to a birth anyway) - is YAN example of rampant innumeracy (Yeah, skimming the book Innumeracy again lately) The ""debate"" is so screwed up it isn't even wrong - so we need no more idiotic simplifications than are already out there, thankyouverymuch.




A.