IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New other than moving to the religious forum sure
if the earth stopped rotating to allow the sun to stay in the sky for more that 24 hrs during a certain battle the centrific force would mean all objects on the earth would halt but air is not tied by gravity so you would have horrendous winds. Centrists beleive therefore that the universe revolves around the earth. However that would cause serious gravitational conflicts that would cause galactic explosions that would have also been recorded but wernt. So if we assume trhe accuracy then lets find some science that supports the observation. Now the earth tilts north south semi annually, this causes the seasonal changes. There is evidence that this swing is not identical every year. In the year that the battle happened and the sun stayed in the sky it might be that the polar tilt toward the sun was extreme enough to get a noticable arctic effect, it would seem as if the sun stayed in the sky while quite likely it circled the horizon. Fits the reported facts better than the other two theories.
thanx,
bill
All tribal myths are true, for a given value of "true" Terry Pratchett
[link|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/]

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 48 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New I wasn't actually referring to that
I was referring to a talmudic passage which describes the movements of teh sun around the Earth. In any case, it is clear to me that Geocentrism is pseudo science and not to be taken seriously.
     Geocentrism - (bluke) - (41)
         other than moving to the religious forum sure - (boxley) - (1)
             I wasn't actually referring to that - (bluke)
         It's a bogus argument. - (Another Scott)
         Here is one of his responses ... - (bluke) - (28)
             You're arguing with an idiot. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                 I would but ... - (bluke) - (1)
                     You can't control what other people do. - (Another Scott)
             my answer to this specific - (boxley) - (22)
                 also why do toilets/huricanes/typhoons rotate in different - (boxley) - (21)
                     Toilets don't depend on hemisphere - (ben_tilly) - (20)
                         eh, flush your can, static flush your can - (boxley) - (19)
                             Google for proof if you want - (ben_tilly) - (18)
                                 I just remember when I became a frog - (boxley) - (17)
                                     Somebody was playing games on you - (ben_tilly) - (16)
                                         having dug in the bowels of many a toilet - (boxley) - (15)
                                             It probably has more to do with the toilet design. - (Another Scott) - (14)
                                                 again let static and meerkat pull the top off their tank - (boxley) - (13)
                                                     Sure. But ye canna change the laws of physics! - (Another Scott)
                                                     Perhaps it isn't obvious to you... - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                                                         You actually spent time researching this? - (bionerd) - (3)
                                                             It's not just a toilet, it's a belief system. - (admin) - (2)
                                                                 ICLRPD (new thread) - (Steve Lowe)
                                                                 ICLRPD (new thread) - (static)
                                                         okay, we have 10 toilets in this building I will flush them - (boxley) - (5)
                                                             ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk)
                                                             Invalid - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                                                 Also invalid because ... - (drewk)
                                                             We have a counter-clockwise one here. - (admin) - (1)
                                                                 good enough I retract my statement about earth rotation - (boxley)
                                                     Actually, we can't perform that experiment. - (static)
             He falls apart at the third line - (JayMehaffey)
             He's an idiot - (ben_tilly)
         Am I in the Dark Ages or something? - (warmachine) - (1)
             You've jumbled the story - (ben_tilly)
         Yeah, here in California we have the Flat Earth Society**. - (Andrew Grygus) - (6)
             part I dont understand is if at sealevel the horizon - (boxley) - (5)
                 He believes in a geocentric universe, not a flat Earth -NT - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                     was responding to Andrews flat earth stuff -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                         Yeah, it's called 'topic drift' . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                         Oops. - (ben_tilly)
                 Hey, ask them, not me . . . - (Andrew Grygus)

We've spent the past two years building up an immunity to Iocaine!
51 ms