IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Chess Games Forum / Response in last edit
Post #207,213
by ben_tilly
5/13/05 12:44:48 AM
5/13/05 1:43:52 PM
Reply
New Response in last edit
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Collapse Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 12:45:03 AM EDT
Please hide attempted solutions...
And note that you missed a possible response of Black's.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Collapse Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:39 PM EDT
Please hide attempted solutions...
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Collapse Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
Response in last edit
Well done! You'd be amazed at how many people I saw yesterday who found the solution, had it pointed out that the king had another move and didn't realize that they could finish it the same way.

It was..quite amusing.. :-)

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Collapse All History
     Mate in 2. - (ben_tilly) - (17) - May 12, 2005, 11:11:07 PM EDT
         dunno the issue, whites move? - (boxley) - (10) - May 12, 2005, 09:33:32 PM EDT
             The issue is finding mate in 2 - (ben_tilly) - (9) - May 12, 2005, 09:37:43 PM EDT
                 well if - (boxley) - (8) - May 12, 2005, 09:42:21 PM EDT
                     You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (ben_tilly) - (7) - May 12, 2005, 10:52:20 PM EDT
                         Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (dws) - (6) - May 12, 2005, 10:59:22 PM EDT
                             Let's put that in algebraic notation... - (ben_tilly) - (5) - May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT
                                 Intentially vague - (dws) - (4) - May 12, 2005, 11:29:04 PM EDT
                                     I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT
                                         Mixing notations... - (dws) - (2) - May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT
                                             Response in last edit -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
                                             Dammit - (drewk) - May 13, 2005, 02:03:00 PM EDT
         Nevermind. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - May 12, 2005, 11:56:32 PM EDT
             Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 12:05:55 AM EDT
         Re: Mate in 2. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3) - April 26, 2006, 10:26:01 PM EDT
             Complete solution? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - April 27, 2006, 02:20:33 AM EDT
                 Edited. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - April 27, 2006, 10:35:36 PM EDT
                     Yup, please edit that subject line though. -NT - (ben_tilly) - April 27, 2006, 05:36:19 PM EDT

This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.
119 ms