Mate in 2. - (ben_tilly) - (17) - May 12, 2005, 11:11:07 PM EDT
         dunno the issue, whites move? - (boxley) - (10) - May 12, 2005, 09:33:32 PM EDT
             The issue is finding mate in 2 - (ben_tilly) - (9) - May 12, 2005, 09:37:43 PM EDT
                 well if - (boxley) - (8) - May 12, 2005, 09:42:21 PM EDT
                     You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (ben_tilly) - (7) - May 12, 2005, 10:52:20 PM EDT
                         Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (dws) - (6) - May 12, 2005, 10:59:22 PM EDT
                             Let's put that in algebraic notation... - (ben_tilly) - (5) - May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT
                                 Intentially vague - (dws) - (4) - May 12, 2005, 11:29:04 PM EDT
                                     I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT
                                         Mixing notations... - (dws) - (2) - May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT
                                             Response in last edit -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
                                             Dammit - (drewk) - May 13, 2005, 02:03:00 PM EDT
         Nevermind. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - May 12, 2005, 11:56:32 PM EDT
             Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 12:05:55 AM EDT
         Re: Mate in 2. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3) - April 26, 2006, 10:26:01 PM EDT
             Complete solution? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - April 27, 2006, 02:20:33 AM EDT
                 Edited. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - April 27, 2006, 10:35:36 PM EDT
                     Yup, please edit that subject line though. -NT - (ben_tilly) - April 27, 2006, 05:36:19 PM EDT