IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Chess Games Forum / Response in last edit
Post #207,213
by ben_tilly
5/13/05 12:44:48 AM
5/13/05 1:43:52 PM
Reply
New Response in last edit
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Collapse Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 12:45:03 AM EDT
Please hide attempted solutions...
And note that you missed a possible response of Black's.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:39 PM EDT
Collapse Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
Response in last edit
Well done! You'd be amazed at how many people I saw yesterday who found the solution, had it pointed out that the king had another move and didn't realize that they could finish it the same way.

It was..quite amusing.. :-)

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Expand All History | Collapse All History
     Mate in 2. - (ben_tilly) - (17) - May 12, 2005, 11:11:07 PM EDT
         dunno the issue, whites move? - (boxley) - (10) - May 12, 2005, 09:33:32 PM EDT
             The issue is finding mate in 2 - (ben_tilly) - (9) - May 12, 2005, 09:37:43 PM EDT
                 well if - (boxley) - (8) - May 12, 2005, 09:42:21 PM EDT
                     You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (ben_tilly) - (7) - May 12, 2005, 10:52:20 PM EDT
                         Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (dws) - (6) - May 12, 2005, 10:59:22 PM EDT
                             Let's put that in algebraic notation... - (ben_tilly) - (5) - May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT
                                 Intentially vague - (dws) - (4) - May 12, 2005, 11:29:04 PM EDT
                                     I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT
                                         Mixing notations... - (dws) - (2) - May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT
                                             Response in last edit -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
                                             Dammit - (drewk) - May 13, 2005, 02:03:00 PM EDT
         Nevermind. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - May 12, 2005, 11:56:32 PM EDT
             Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 12:05:55 AM EDT
         Re: Mate in 2. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3) - April 26, 2006, 10:26:01 PM EDT
             Complete solution? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - April 27, 2006, 02:20:33 AM EDT
                 Edited. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - April 27, 2006, 10:35:36 PM EDT
                     Yup, please edit that subject line though. -NT - (ben_tilly) - April 27, 2006, 05:36:19 PM EDT

Well, all right then.
149 ms