Well done! You'd be amazed at how many people I saw yesterday who found the solution, had it pointed out that the king had another move and didn't realize that they could finish it the same way.
It was..quite amusing.. :-)
Cheers,
Ben
Response in last edit
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
|
Mate in 2.
- (ben_tilly)
- (17)
- May 12, 2005, 11:11:07 PM EDT
dunno the issue, whites move?
- (boxley)
- (10)
- May 12, 2005, 09:33:32 PM EDT
The issue is finding mate in 2
- (ben_tilly)
- (9)
- May 12, 2005, 09:37:43 PM EDT
well if
- (boxley)
- (8)
- May 12, 2005, 09:42:21 PM EDT
You are taking more than 2 moves to win.
- (ben_tilly)
- (7)
- May 12, 2005, 10:52:20 PM EDT
Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win.
- (dws)
- (6)
- May 12, 2005, 10:59:22 PM EDT
Let's put that in algebraic notation...
- (ben_tilly)
- (5)
- May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT
Intentially vague
- (dws)
- (4)
- May 12, 2005, 11:29:04 PM EDT
I'll hide my response to that in an edit then...
- (ben_tilly)
- (3)
- May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT
Mixing notations...
- (dws)
- (2)
- May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT
Response in last edit
-NT
- (ben_tilly)
- May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
Dammit
- (drewk)
- May 13, 2005, 02:03:00 PM EDT
Nevermind.
- (inthane-chan)
- (1)
- May 12, 2005, 11:56:32 PM EDT
Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move
-NT
- (ben_tilly)
- May 13, 2005, 12:05:55 AM EDT
Re: Mate in 2.
-NT
- (inthane-chan)
- (3)
- April 26, 2006, 10:26:01 PM EDT
Complete solution?
-NT
- (ben_tilly)
- (2)
- April 27, 2006, 02:20:33 AM EDT
Edited.
- (inthane-chan)
- (1)
- April 27, 2006, 10:35:36 PM EDT
Yup, please edit that subject line though.
-NT
- (ben_tilly)
- April 27, 2006, 05:36:19 PM EDT