IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Chess Games Forum / Mixing notations...
Post #207,211
by dws
5/13/05 12:31:11 AM
5/13/05 4:12:57 AM
Reply
New Mixing notations...
solution in last edit
Expand Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 12:48:29 AM EDT
Collapse Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 04:12:19 AM EDT
Mixing notations...
(Proposed solution removed until I figure out how to hide things)

And it's time to schedule a trip to the eye doc. I wasted two minutes before seeing that the 'p' wasn't a 'P'.
Collapse Edited by dws May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT
Mixing notations...
1. Q-e2 leaves black with two moves

1. ..... K-d3
2. RxP mate

1. ..... K-f4
2. RxP mate

Expand All History | Collapse All History
Post #207,213
by ben_tilly
5/13/05 12:44:48 AM
5/13/05 1:43:52 PM
Reply
New Response in last edit
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 12:45:03 AM EDT
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:39 PM EDT
Expand Edited by ben_tilly May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
Expand All History
Post #207,268
by drewk
Picture of drewk
5/13/05 2:03:00 PM
Reply
New Dammit
That makes two of us need new glasses.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
     Mate in 2. - (ben_tilly) - (17) - May 12, 2005, 11:11:07 PM EDT
         dunno the issue, whites move? - (boxley) - (10) - May 12, 2005, 09:33:32 PM EDT
             The issue is finding mate in 2 - (ben_tilly) - (9) - May 12, 2005, 09:37:43 PM EDT
                 well if - (boxley) - (8) - May 12, 2005, 09:42:21 PM EDT
                     You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (ben_tilly) - (7) - May 12, 2005, 10:52:20 PM EDT
                         Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (dws) - (6) - May 12, 2005, 10:59:22 PM EDT
                             Let's put that in algebraic notation... - (ben_tilly) - (5) - May 12, 2005, 11:53:29 PM EDT
                                 Intentially vague - (dws) - (4) - May 12, 2005, 11:29:04 PM EDT
                                     I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - May 12, 2005, 11:44:01 PM EDT
                                         Mixing notations... - (dws) - (2) - May 13, 2005, 04:12:57 AM EDT
                                             Response in last edit -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 01:43:52 PM EDT
                                             Dammit - (drewk) - May 13, 2005, 02:03:00 PM EDT
         Nevermind. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - May 12, 2005, 11:56:32 PM EDT
             Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 13, 2005, 12:05:55 AM EDT
         Re: Mate in 2. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3) - April 26, 2006, 10:26:01 PM EDT
             Complete solution? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - April 27, 2006, 02:20:33 AM EDT
                 Edited. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - April 27, 2006, 10:35:36 PM EDT
                     Yup, please edit that subject line though. -NT - (ben_tilly) - April 27, 2006, 05:36:19 PM EDT

You wouldn't know what normal was if it rode into town on the normal express, kicked down your door with its size normal boots, danced into your living room wearing nothing but the word "normal" and sang "normality is here again" on your dining room table whilst dancing the foxtrot.
62 ms