IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New It was really an attack on a person
The hostility was toward the driver - killing the dog was a convenient way to inflict pain on a human.

I agree that the penalty is exessive if you only consider the dog as the victim.
White guys in suits know best
- Pat McCurdy
New Local paper coverage suggested,
Neither judge nor jury thought they detected any slightest sign of remorse - except for the fact that he was found, of course. Later. (he left the scene, of course.. a true coward)

My surmise is that, the "issue" pretty much sub-rosa, has something to do also with - the Murican habit of treating even so-called 'pets' as disposable commodities, once their entertainment value drops below that of the next toy to catch the light just right. Likely too - for many other persons (and not just old folks with cats) - their esteem for the animal more than rivals that for any (living?) human contacts. Pets are, at the very least - not duplicitous.

Killing a 'pet' this important to another is - as you say - an act just-short of - murder of the owner. Merely a surrogate then, for intent to murder another.

He got barely what he 'deserved' IMO. You cannot match-up other crimes on some Mohr scale of 'hardness' - which is why we Have judges (unless it is about Drugs - then we have spreadsheets and no chance for a Judge judging).

I also tend to the belief, from all experience: learning how to 'love' a pet, is for most persons: the best training they ever have on the topic. (And those who never can love an animal - are quite less-likely ever to be capable of 'loving' another homo-sap. At all.)

This creep yielded to his Self-Importance / the utter Outrage! that someone might have scratched his New UAV Bumper -- so he went into full-kill mode. Lock the mfucker up indeed. He won't learn shit, of course - but he'll be away long enough to give the rest of the population a small breather from his execrable presence.

     Dog mauler gets 3 yrs in prison - (boxley) - (15)
         Disagree - (hnick) - (9)
             Sounds fair to me - let Bill have 10 0's a week though.. -NT - (Ashton) - (4)
                 A dicker? 7 and a half 0's/w should be more than enough... -NT - (hnick) - (3)
                     Nope: he doesn't understand the concept, 1/"2" See? -NT - (Ashton) - (2)
                         Simple: divide by 0 twice... -NT - (hnick) - (1)
                             Sorry: then you get My IQ for the result. NA. -NT - (Ashton)
             ot sig - (boxley) - (3)
                 Oops... Totally missed the reference.... - (hnick) - (2)
                     *chuckle* - (imric) - (1)
                         Silicon Valley? - (hnick)
         How many years for the mauler dogs? - (wharris2) - (4)
             Disable preview in Prefs = uncheck the [x] box. -NT - (Ashton) - (1)
                 Re: Disable preview in Prefs = uncheck the [x] box. - (wharris2)
             It was really an attack on a person - (mhuber) - (1)
                 Local paper coverage suggested, - (Ashton)

When things get creepy... blame it on the Boogie!
76 ms