Eh... Stupid solution?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #202,456 by Arkadiy 4/8/05 11:05:49 AM Reply	Eh... Stupid solution? A monitoring script that would mark file read only 0.5 second after it shows up? Or when it stops growing for 0.5 second? On NT, I would even vaguely know how to do it without polling. -- "Consider a perfectly spherical cow, radiating milk isotropically." -- [link\|http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002008.html\|Language Log]
Post #202,538 by broomberg 4/8/05 6:48:49 PM Reply	Yeah, thought about it I threw up my hands today, said "Screw it, I'm gonna cheat", and write a script that gets kicked off by crontab every 5 minutes to walk the dir tree (there can be many) and chmod / chown as needed. And then, I said, "Screw it all. This is on the bottom of my priority list, why am I wasting oxygen thinking about it?" My PFY was giving me odd looks at that point, and I didn't feel like explaining. So I then buried it.
Post #202,623 by jake123 4/9/05 1:44:00 PM Reply	Having just wrapped this sort of thing up in OS it sounds like a classic "this can only be solved by capabilities vs. access lists" problem. This came right after we were taught how to write buffer overflows. Wheee! ;) --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

Greg: Samba question - (broomberg) - (11) - April 7, 2005, 04:42:12 PM EDT

I would have to believe... - (folkert) - (10) - April 7, 2005, 09:50:30 PM EDT

Can force writes be done on a dir basis? - (broomberg) - (9) - April 7, 2005, 10:09:55 PM EDT

I'll have ta ask. I believe you can do it per file... - (folkert) - (7) - April 7, 2005, 11:24:25 PM EDT

Please follow up - (broomberg) - (6) - April 8, 2005, 08:26:07 AM EDT

Personally I think you're SOL - (pwhysall) - (1) - April 8, 2005, 08:47:20 AM EDT

That was my thought as well. - (Another Scott) - April 8, 2005, 09:10:40 AM EDT

Eh... Stupid solution? - (Arkadiy) - (2) - April 8, 2005, 11:05:49 AM EDT

Yeah, thought about it - (broomberg) - (1) - April 8, 2005, 06:48:49 PM EDT

Having just wrapped this sort of thing up in OS - (jake123) - April 9, 2005, 01:44:00 PM EDT

I think we are chasing several dead-ends - (folkert) - April 8, 2005, 12:06:26 PM EDT

Share only I believe - (Steven A S) - April 8, 2005, 02:25:52 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Over 9000!
41 ms