IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / No, we did it for oil.
Post #201,081
by Arkadiy
Picture of Arkadiy
3/29/05 11:44:31 AM
Reply
New No, we did it for oil.
--


And what are we doing when the two most powerful nations on earth -- America and Israel -- stomp on the elementary rights of human beings?

-- letter to the editor from W. Ostermeier, Liechtenstein

     Bill Tierney on torture - (dmcarls) - (38) - March 29, 2005, 09:34:44 AM EST
         Interesting piece. Thanks! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - March 29, 2005, 09:58:04 AM EST
         "But are we litigating this war or fighting it?" - (Arkadiy) - (36) - March 29, 2005, 10:01:05 AM EST
             The real question - (jake123) - (14) - March 29, 2005, 11:25:57 AM EST
                 There are two questions here - (Arkadiy) - (8) - March 29, 2005, 11:37:13 AM EST
                     And Bin Laden is, of course, why we have taken over Iraq. -NT - (imric) - (1) - March 29, 2005, 11:42:44 AM EST
                         No, we did it for oil. -NT - (Arkadiy) - March 29, 2005, 11:44:31 AM EST
                     Bin Laden can say what he likes. - (pwhysall) - (5) - March 29, 2005, 11:53:45 AM EST
                         You can say what you like. - (Arkadiy) - (4) - March 29, 2005, 11:57:12 AM EST
                             What's that got to do with the price of cheese? -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - March 29, 2005, 12:01:52 PM EST
                                 Bin Laden has an ambition to be the Emir - (Arkadiy) - (2) - March 29, 2005, 12:05:26 PM EST
                                     The "Third Chechen War" - (jake123) - (1) - March 29, 2005, 12:09:42 PM EST
                                         Grrr... - (Arkadiy) - March 29, 2005, 12:24:04 PM EST
                 I think it's more like piracy. - (Another Scott) - (4) - March 29, 2005, 11:38:32 AM EST
                     So, when do we see a letter of marque? - (jake123) - (3) - March 29, 2005, 12:11:03 PM EST
                         Dunno. That's a very good point. - (Another Scott) - March 29, 2005, 12:55:58 PM EST
                         you have one, they are called contractors - (boxley) - (1) - March 29, 2005, 06:15:25 PM EST
                             Like the British privateers harrying the Spanish Main. - (pwhysall) - March 29, 2005, 06:18:25 PM EST
             Damn right - (ben_tilly) - March 29, 2005, 12:11:58 PM EST
             Have to disagree on that.... - (Simon_Jester) - (19) - March 29, 2005, 06:11:12 PM EST
                 No, there is plenty of support for - (Arkadiy) - (18) - March 31, 2005, 09:19:36 AM EST
                     I disagree - (jake123) - (7) - March 31, 2005, 09:26:48 AM EST
                         "Going after bikn Laden" - (Arkadiy) - (6) - March 31, 2005, 09:38:07 AM EST
                             Sorry, you seem to be forgetting something - (jake123) - March 31, 2005, 09:50:50 AM EST
                             Sorry, you seem to be forgetting something - (jb4) - (4) - March 31, 2005, 11:15:26 AM EST
                                 Yes - (Arkadiy) - (3) - March 31, 2005, 11:19:02 AM EST
                                     Maybe not in your mind - (jb4) - (2) - March 31, 2005, 11:53:37 AM EST
                                         Eh? Nit. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 31, 2005, 01:45:01 PM EST
                                             IIRC... - (jb4) - April 1, 2005, 10:49:22 AM EST
                     I agree - (Silverlock) - (6) - March 31, 2005, 09:37:15 AM EST
                         My point exactly. -NT - (Arkadiy) - (3) - March 31, 2005, 09:38:31 AM EST
                             Nod...point taken... - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - March 31, 2005, 11:48:57 AM EST
                                 Wall of tanks across Pakistan? - (Arkadiy) - (1) - March 31, 2005, 12:08:45 PM EST
                                     Not among the moneyed classes - (jake123) - March 31, 2005, 12:14:31 PM EST
                         Define succesful - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - March 31, 2005, 10:08:35 AM EST
                             Not a failure at stated purpose -NT - (Silverlock) - March 31, 2005, 11:03:53 AM EST
                     I firmly believe that you're wrong about that - (ben_tilly) - (2) - March 31, 2005, 02:36:15 PM EST
                         One of us is highly untypical. - (Arkadiy) - (1) - March 31, 2005, 03:26:24 PM EST
                             Truly none? - (ben_tilly) - March 31, 2005, 04:33:33 PM EST

iwethey.org
Helmet of the meat!
50 ms