It's a bit too late to have theological discussion

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #201,062 by Arkadiy 3/29/05 10:26:42 AM Reply	It's a bit too late to have theological discussion when you are in the jury room. Act on your own frigging convictions and leave others to act on theirs. On the other hand, as my friend who served a couple times puts it, "the jurors I served with were definitely not my peers, and I will endeavor to keep as far away from them as possible". -- And what are we doing when the two most powerful nations on earth -- America and Israel -- stomp on the elementary rights of human beings? -- letter to the editor from W. Ostermeier, Liechtenstein
Post #201,071 by jake123 3/29/05 11:18:12 AM Reply	One interesting practice I've read about is the practice of opening the bible to a random passage and looking for its relevance to the situation at hand. This was very common a couple of centuries ago, and still goes on today. If they were doing that, then the verdict should be voided. Of course, whether that's the case can't really be known. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #201,075 by Arkadiy 3/29/05 11:32:58 AM Reply	Another practice I heard about is the practice of wild speculation without facts in hand. In a courtroom, that's prone to render the verdict null and void :) -- And what are we doing when the two most powerful nations on earth -- America and Israel -- stomp on the elementary rights of human beings? -- letter to the editor from W. Ostermeier, Liechtenstein
Post #201,076 by jake123 3/29/05 11:34:02 AM Reply	That's true which is why I said "IF that's what they did." If they didn't, then tossing the verdict based on that is a crock. IMhO. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

Death penalty by Colorado jury thrown out on appeal. - (Another Scott) - (12) - March 28, 2005, 11:47:50 PM EST

Run away! Get out while you can! - (warmachine) - (1) - March 29, 2005, 05:03:26 AM EST

could be worse, some tart throwing a sword out of the water. - (boxley) - March 29, 2005, 07:30:44 AM EST

Except they're wrong. - (ubernostrum) - (1) - March 29, 2005, 05:24:54 AM EST

You've got a point there... :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - March 29, 2005, 07:39:39 AM EST

I wonder what they used the Bible for - (Arkadiy) - (7) - March 29, 2005, 09:54:45 AM EST

Excerpts. - (Another Scott) - (6) - March 29, 2005, 10:01:17 AM EST

Well, as long as they did not try to actually - (Arkadiy) - (5) - March 29, 2005, 10:22:09 AM EST

To show/prove to others. -NT - (jbrabeck) - (4) - March 29, 2005, 10:23:58 AM EST

It's a bit too late to have theological discussion - (Arkadiy) - (3) - March 29, 2005, 10:26:42 AM EST

One interesting practice I've read about - (jake123) - (2) - March 29, 2005, 11:18:12 AM EST

Another practice I heard about - (Arkadiy) - (1) - March 29, 2005, 11:32:58 AM EST

That's true - (jake123) - March 29, 2005, 11:34:02 AM EST

iwethey.org

Shock the monkey!
239 ms