IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Well, as long as they did not try to actually
apply the "criminal code" in the Old Testament, it may not be too bad. I am rather surprised that people who care enough about the Bible to consider it on jury duty need to refer to the actual text. One would think that they have internalized the wizdom they care for.
--


And what are we doing when the two most powerful nations on earth -- America and Israel -- stomp on the elementary rights of human beings?

-- letter to the editor from W. Ostermeier, Liechtenstein

New To show/prove to others.
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail ... but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn...that was fun!"
New It's a bit too late to have theological discussion
when you are in the jury room. Act on your own frigging convictions and leave others to act on theirs.

On the other hand, as my friend who served a couple times puts it, "the jurors I served with were definitely not my peers, and I will endeavor to keep as far away from them as possible".
--


And what are we doing when the two most powerful nations on earth -- America and Israel -- stomp on the elementary rights of human beings?

-- letter to the editor from W. Ostermeier, Liechtenstein

New One interesting practice I've read about
is the practice of opening the bible to a random passage and looking for its relevance to the situation at hand. This was very common a couple of centuries ago, and still goes on today.

If they were doing that, then the verdict should be voided. Of course, whether that's the case can't really be known.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Another practice I heard about
is the practice of wild speculation without facts in hand. In a courtroom, that's prone to render the verdict null and void :)
--


And what are we doing when the two most powerful nations on earth -- America and Israel -- stomp on the elementary rights of human beings?

-- letter to the editor from W. Ostermeier, Liechtenstein

New That's true
which is why I said "IF that's what they did." If they didn't, then tossing the verdict based on that is a crock. IMhO.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
     Death penalty by Colorado jury thrown out on appeal. - (Another Scott) - (12)
         Run away! Get out while you can! - (warmachine) - (1)
             could be worse, some tart throwing a sword out of the water. - (boxley)
         Except they're wrong. - (ubernostrum) - (1)
             You've got a point there... :-/ -NT - (Another Scott)
         I wonder what they used the Bible for - (Arkadiy) - (7)
             Excerpts. - (Another Scott) - (6)
                 Well, as long as they did not try to actually - (Arkadiy) - (5)
                     To show/prove to others. -NT - (jbrabeck) - (4)
                         It's a bit too late to have theological discussion - (Arkadiy) - (3)
                             One interesting practice I've read about - (jake123) - (2)
                                 Another practice I heard about - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                                     That's true - (jake123)

Pull. Snick! Push. Snick! Pull. Snick!
42 ms