IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Flame Quarantine Forum / It was settled because...
Post #200,196
by jb4
Picture of jb4
3/23/05 6:24:23 PM
3/24/05 8:02:08 PM
Reply
New It was settled because...
...the land speculators knew there'd need to be suburbs for that soon-to-be-booming-metropolis known as Fort Dearborn!

Surely an astute student of geo-history as your esteemed self should already know that!

[Edit: typo so the last paragraph made something resembling sense...]
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

Expand Edited by jb4 March 24, 2005, 08:01:33 PM EST
Expand Edited by jb4 March 24, 2005, 08:02:08 PM EST
Expand All History
Post #200,273
by mmoffitt
3/24/05 8:10:35 AM
Reply
New :-)
bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
God Bless America.
Post #200,514
by CRConrad
3/25/05 4:09:08 PM
Reply
New First edit made it make perfect sense; the second undid it.
Post #200,538
by jb4
Picture of jb4
3/25/05 6:08:58 PM
Reply
New It's been a long day yesterday...
Just read it however you like it....
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
     There is NO redeeming virtue to life in NE Indiana. - (mmoffitt) - (44) - March 10, 2005, 04:44:59 PM EST
         And here I am complaining... - (ben_tilly) - March 10, 2005, 06:03:38 PM EST
         *whine* - (admin) - (38) - March 10, 2005, 06:43:58 PM EST
             *cheese* -NT - (n3jja) - March 11, 2005, 12:13:54 AM EST
             I know. It's snowed EVERY - (mmoffitt) - (36) - March 11, 2005, 08:30:41 AM EST
                 One two safe months... - (lister) - March 11, 2005, 08:59:07 AM EST
                 Yabut - (admin) - (30) - March 11, 2005, 04:15:31 PM EST
                     I'd trade earthquakes for snow/cold any day. - (mmoffitt) - (29) - March 14, 2005, 11:31:29 AM EST
                         Not odd at all - (ben_tilly) - (28) - March 14, 2005, 11:32:57 AM EST
                             I don't think that's it. - (mmoffitt) - (27) - March 14, 2005, 11:37:01 AM EST
                                 It already has. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 14, 2005, 11:59:18 AM EST
                                     Right. To the north. - (mmoffitt) - March 14, 2005, 01:09:06 PM EST
                                 Re: I don't think that's it. - (admin) - (24) - March 14, 2005, 01:37:25 PM EST
                                     There's a 58.4329% probability that that's true. -NT - (Another Scott) - (3) - March 14, 2005, 01:42:21 PM EST
                                         It's a mandate! A landslide! Total validation! -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 14, 2005, 01:46:40 PM EST
                                             No, a mandate is 51.2441269406386282368653206 % HTH! :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 14, 2005, 01:56:21 PM EST
                                                 49% if you're using Diebold. -NT - (inthane-chan) - March 14, 2005, 02:35:13 PM EST
                                     88.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot. -NT - (pwhysall) - (19) - March 14, 2005, 02:47:25 PM EST
                                         Where's your supporting data buddy? It's 89.74% -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (18) - March 14, 2005, 03:22:19 PM EST
                                             That's all right. 67.342% of all statistics are wrong. -NT - (imric) - (17) - March 14, 2005, 03:38:57 PM EST
                                                 Huh? Last I heard wrong was hugging 100%. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (16) - March 14, 2005, 04:12:41 PM EST
                                                     See? -NT - (imric) - March 14, 2005, 04:27:51 PM EST
                                                     100.5% are wrong -NT - (Arkadiy) - (14) - March 14, 2005, 04:57:44 PM EST
                                                         Been taking math lessons from Dubya? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (13) - March 14, 2005, 05:06:40 PM EST
                                                             In that case, it would be 200% -NT - (Arkadiy) - (12) - March 14, 2005, 05:27:43 PM EST
                                                                 No,No,No. that'd be 200i% -NT - (folkert) - (11) - March 14, 2005, 06:20:39 PM EST
                                                                     You - (Ashton) - March 15, 2005, 12:32:17 AM EST
                                                                     Did you just insinuate that the current US President - (Arkadiy) - (9) - March 15, 2005, 11:34:03 AM EST
                                                                         So, I guess you got the Joke then. Excellent. - (folkert) - (8) - March 15, 2005, 03:05:54 PM EST
                                                                             So could you say... - (static) - (7) - March 15, 2005, 10:21:06 PM EST
                                                                                 It's not even a parallel reality. It's perpendicular. -NT - (Arkadiy) - (6) - March 16, 2005, 09:18:43 AM EST
                                                                                     "It might be at 90 deg to reality, but in which direction?" -NT - (static) - (5) - March 16, 2005, 11:23:44 PM EST
                                                                                         Counterclockwise - (Arkadiy) - (4) - March 17, 2005, 09:05:01 AM EST
                                                                                             OTOH, "a right turn" is usually seen as = "a clockwise turn" -NT - (CRConrad) - (3) - March 17, 2005, 09:07:42 AM EST
                                                                                                 In which hemisphere, Northern or Southern? -NT - (folkert) - (2) - March 17, 2005, 09:37:39 AM EST
                                                                                                     Clocks and watches turn the same way everywhere, AFAIK. - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 18, 2005, 02:37:54 AM EST
                                                                                                         I see you got the insinuation. -NT - (folkert) - March 18, 2005, 08:51:37 AM EST
                 It was settled because... - (jb4) - (3) - March 24, 2005, 08:02:08 PM EST
                     :-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 24, 2005, 08:10:35 AM EST
                     First edit made it make perfect sense; the second undid it. -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 25, 2005, 04:09:08 PM EST
                         It's been a long day yesterday... - (jb4) - March 25, 2005, 06:08:58 PM EST
         Hardest I had it... - (ChrisR) - (1) - March 10, 2005, 06:57:32 PM EST
             Just in the summer? -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - March 10, 2005, 08:24:27 PM EST
         It snowed here again last night - (bionerd) - (1) - March 12, 2005, 11:15:45 AM EST
             Does the melting include sidewalks? - (lister) - March 15, 2005, 12:15:14 PM EST

You've got a lot of repressed feelings, don't you?
74 ms