While mentioning that specific example would strengthen the reasonableness of that action, it would also open up the possibility of arguing that past actions were merely bugs, and not intended. Might as well not open up room for that criticism.

Still I think the point stands. The agreement as it stands will not effectively restrict the behavioural problems it is supposedly intended to address. Hopefully the judge, attorney generals, or some political figures will read what I wrote and be disgusted enough to react. If not, then I don't know what more I could effectively say to show how obviously rotten this PoS sellout is.

Cheers,
Ben