IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New What concentration?
These press reports never say what concentration the Pu is supposed to be in the DU. I wonder why that is? (Not really...)

[link|http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/en/Report_WHO_depleted_uranium_Eng.pdf|WHO Report] (.pdf) on DU in Kosovo, p.7:

In addition to U235, U234 and U238, the mission was confronted with questions on the presence of plutonium or other radioactive chemicals in the munitions. KFOR informed the mission that it did not exclude the possibility that traces of plutonium could be present in depleted uranium. This is because the enrichment of some natural uranium, from which depleted uranium is a waste by-product, occurred at a production facility that had been used previously for the processing of spent fuel rods from nuclear reactors. The production facility had not been completely cleaned and cross-contamination could have been possible.

According to NATO (referring to a statement placed on the Internet on 18 January 2001) it "has long been established that there may be trace elements of U236 and plutonium in depleted uranium." The presence of plutonium was addressed in a report of the US Department of Defense (2000), which also contains comments on the possible presence of trace elements of other materials in depleted uranium. The report concludes that depleted uranium \ufffdmay contain trace levels (a few parts per billion) of transuranics (neptunium, plutonium and americium). Tests on samples of DU showed that transuranic contamination added 0.8% to the radiation dose from DU."

With regard to the presence of U236 in Kosovo, UNEP has mentioned (UNEP press release,16 January 2001) that "along with the more commonly expected isotopes, one of the laboratories has reported finding 0.0028% of U236." The UNEP press release says the \ufffdcontent of U236 in depleted uranium is so small that the radio-toxicity is not changed compared to DU without U236." Consequently, it has been concluded that detection of U236 indicates part of the depleted uranium originates from reprocessed uranium.

It would appear that the presence of the U236 isotope led to the scientific deduction that plutonium may also be present. At a meeting immediately prior to the commencement of the WHO mission in Kosovo, UNEP informed the team that the laboratory had not reported detecting any plutonium in their samples. After the mission returned from Kosovo, UNEP announced (press release, 16 February 2001) that traces of Pu239 and Pu240 were found in four penetrators. UNEP advised that the content of the plutonium found is very low and does not have any significant impact on overall radioactivity.


Oh, and there was plutonium in the soil, worldwide, before DU started being used. E.g. [link|http://www.davistownmuseum.org/cbm/RadxPlutonium.html|this] article from Nature from 1973.

I don't think Pu in DU is a significant (i.e. measurable) risk. YMMV.

Cheers,
Scott.
New It Can't be Good (or even average)
Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
New Correct. It's below average.
--


And what are we doing when the two most powerful nations on earth -- America and Israel -- stomp on the elementary rights of human beings?

-- letter to the editor from W. Ostermeier, Liechtenstein

     Here's some terrorism for you - (andread) - (52)
         Sounds like we should.... - (ChrisR)
         Bull - (Arkadiy) - (11)
             When thousands of tons are used and burned it gets in you -NT - (andread) - (1)
                 If you want to worry yourself into a frienzy, I can't stop - (Arkadiy)
             Exercise critical thinking... - (pwhysall) - (7)
                 Some critical thinking would be nice all the way around. - (ChrisR) - (6)
                     Thank you. - (Arkadiy) - (5)
                         Non-issue? - (Silverlock) - (4)
                             Ok, not a "radiocative weapon"/genocide - (Arkadiy) - (3)
                                 That's a non-argument, Ark. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                     True - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                                         Radon concentrations are bad too. - (imric)
             how did one get out of the heavy work details in the gulag? - (boxley)
         How can you take that seriously? - (Another Scott) - (38)
             Actually, while some of the language is hyperbolic - (jake123) - (37)
                 Several of the critics have problems. - (Another Scott)
                 Hard to know how that shakes out - (ChrisR) - (34)
                     the shake out - (andread) - (33)
                         By "intervention in Yugoslavia", do you mean Kosovo? - (Arkadiy) - (32)
                             The UN did a study of DU in Kosovo - (andread) - (31)
                                 Re: The UN did a study of DU in Kosovo - (Arkadiy) - (30)
                                     Toothsome Morsel: - (jb4) - (29)
                                         And also - (Arkadiy) - (4)
                                             You know what my point is! - (jb4) - (3)
                                                 Skepticism is good and necessary. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                     I defer judgement until ... - (jb4)
                                                 Errr. That was an UN study - (Arkadiy)
                                         Flip that around. - (Another Scott) - (23)
                                             Agreed. - (jb4) - (22)
                                                 Okay. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                     OT: Mind your attributions. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                         Ack! Thanks. Fixed. Now to fix the other one... -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                 Let's cut to the chase - (Silverlock) - (18)
                                                     Granite is a radiocative substance used in a weapon - (Arkadiy) - (14)
                                                         Cute - (Silverlock) - (13)
                                                             DU is used for the same reason as granite - (Arkadiy) - (12)
                                                                 Thats a good one - (Silverlock) - (3)
                                                                     It is used for ballast and counterweights - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                         Hint: - (jb4) - (1)
                                                                             Perfectly. :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                 Spell p-l-u-t-o-n-i-u-m - (andread) - (7)
                                                                     "potentially contaminated" - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                                                         Look, the real problem with DU munitions - (jake123) - (1)
                                                                             Some earlier links addressed that. - (Another Scott)
                                                                         Links to go - (andread) - (3)
                                                                             What concentration? - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                                 It Can't be Good (or even average) -NT - (andread) - (1)
                                                                                     Correct. It's below average. -NT - (Arkadiy)
                                                     Careful what you wish for. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                         Nice sleuthing, A.S. - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                             MTBE was used for good reasons. - (Another Scott)
                 Timeframe depends on who our next president is... -NT - (jb4)

Impossible.
196 ms