Here's as good as anywhere, questioning Metcalfe's Law - (ben_tilly) - (30) - March 3, 2005, 01:38:39 AM EST
         I stopped at the point where - (Arkadiy) - (15) - March 3, 2005, 09:48:43 AM EST
             He's not saying what you think - (ben_tilly) - (14) - March 3, 2005, 10:54:49 AM EST
                 At least two of his examples are wrong - (Arkadiy) - (13) - March 3, 2005, 12:05:32 PM EST
                     Disagreement - (ben_tilly) - (12) - March 3, 2005, 01:57:45 PM EST
                         One counter-example, and a possible new POV - (drewk) - (3) - March 3, 2005, 09:11:41 PM EST
                             That's not entirely a counterexample - (ben_tilly) - (2) - March 4, 2005, 02:48:17 PM EST
                                 You got the analogy, but missed the point - (drewk) - (1) - March 4, 2005, 03:27:51 PM EST
                                     Chicken and egg on value - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 04:06:43 AM EST
                         OK, I finished reading - (Arkadiy) - (7) - March 4, 2005, 02:48:53 PM EST
                             If n^2 holds for users... - (ben_tilly) - (6) - March 4, 2005, 02:52:36 PM EST
                                 Switching is not same as joining - (Arkadiy) - (5) - March 4, 2005, 03:37:26 PM EST
                                     Larger by 30% wins? - (ben_tilly) - (4) - March 7, 2005, 04:21:04 AM EST
                                         I guess I should re-read - (Arkadiy) - (1) - March 7, 2005, 09:26:01 AM EST
                                             Read section 4 - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 11:23:39 AM EST
                                         There's your example :-) - (drewk) - (1) - March 7, 2005, 12:26:44 PM EST
                                             More valuable to you, yes - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 12:57:30 PM EST
         I have come to the conclusion... - (folkert) - March 3, 2005, 11:18:45 AM EST
         Re: Paper. - (a6l6e6x) - March 3, 2005, 10:48:07 PM EST
         Something else I just realized - (drewk) - March 4, 2005, 12:03:27 AM EST
         The mathematics is interesting and I presume . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - March 4, 2005, 01:14:02 AM EST
             Mostly true - (ben_tilly) - (6) - March 4, 2005, 02:50:50 PM EST
                 Andrew's obviously talking B2B - (drewk) - (3) - March 4, 2005, 03:07:47 PM EST
                     My very favorite was a B to C - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 4, 2005, 06:08:19 PM EST
                         Oops! -NT - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 04:27:27 AM EST
                     I don't know the breakdown... - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 04:26:36 AM EST
                 But it isn't exactly frictionless . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 4, 2005, 05:50:13 PM EST
                     True but... - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 04:23:25 AM EST
         Ben, do you mind if I cite this for a paper? - (jake123) - (2) - Nov. 22, 2005, 11:29:44 AM EST
             You can cite this, if unpublished papers are acceptable - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 22, 2005, 10:20:54 PM EST
                 No, it works as it's on the net - (jake123) - Nov. 23, 2005, 11:40:41 AM EST