Einstein@home - (pwhysall) - (68) - Feb. 19, 2005, 04:35:59 PM EST
         Well, ya guys might as well . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Feb. 19, 2005, 05:04:03 PM EST
         OK, I've got a Dual 2GHz G5 here... - (Another Scott) - (21) - Feb. 19, 2005, 05:30:31 PM EST
             gzip -dv $FILENAME - (pwhysall) - (19) - Feb. 19, 2005, 05:36:37 PM EST
                 Didn't seem to make any difference. :-( - (Another Scott) - (18) - Feb. 19, 2005, 05:45:49 PM EST
                     It's just the executable right there - (pwhysall) - (17) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:03:20 PM EST
                         I did. Multiple times. - (Another Scott) - (16) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:36:30 PM EST
                             Run it from the terminal. -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:37:35 PM EST
                                 command not found - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:43:59 PM EST
                                     Current directory is not in the path. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:46:14 PM EST
                                         Thanks. Woo and Yay are called for! -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:48:02 PM EST
                             the OS thinks its a doc? - (daemon) - (11) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:40:03 PM EST
                                 That worked?!? - (Another Scott) - (10) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:45:57 PM EST
                                     It means ".\\" ; HTH! (What, you don't remember MS/PC-DOS?) -NT - (CRConrad) - (9) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:50:51 PM EST
                                         It still seems strange to me. - (Another Scott) - (8) - Feb. 19, 2005, 06:59:47 PM EST
                                             Re: It still seems strange to me. - (Yendor) - (7) - Feb. 19, 2005, 07:06:54 PM EST
                                                 Yeah, but why does it matter? - (Another Scott) - (6) - Feb. 19, 2005, 07:22:25 PM EST
                                                     AFAIK the path always matters - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 19, 2005, 07:27:03 PM EST
                                                         DOS/Windows always looked in the current directory. - (static) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2005, 08:26:51 PM EST
                                                             Ick. I always had it in the path so never realized. -NT - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 21, 2005, 10:36:29 AM EST
                                                     common sense for non nix users - (daemon) - (1) - Feb. 19, 2005, 08:01:37 PM EST
                                                         Danke. Thanks to you too Ben. I appreciate it. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 19, 2005, 08:13:03 PM EST
                                                     Consistency, the hobgoblin of little minds - and Unix... :-) - (CRConrad) - Feb. 20, 2005, 03:35:07 PM EST
             More E@H on OS X tips in the Macintosh forum. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:34:20 PM EST
         IWETHEY has now hit the dizzying heights of rank #494... -NT - (Meerkat) - (7) - Feb. 21, 2005, 08:52:32 AM EST
             It's awfully slow in officially granting credits, isn't it? - (Another Scott) - (3) - Feb. 21, 2005, 09:00:20 AM EST
                 Not just me, then :-) - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 21, 2005, 04:24:30 PM EST
                     It's not the screamer I was expecting it to be. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 21, 2005, 05:01:47 PM EST
                         Re: It's not the screamer I was expecting it to be. - (pwhysall) - Feb. 21, 2005, 05:05:37 PM EST
             You seem to have the ubermachine on the team. But SMP helps. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2005, 10:01:00 AM EST
                 Keeps stalling on me - (drewk) - Feb. 24, 2005, 11:56:05 AM EST
                 Will look up the machine details when I get home. - (Meerkat) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:43:38 PM EST
         So does this fight with SETI@home for cycles? -NT - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 21, 2005, 09:37:07 PM EST
             It can, if you set it up that way. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 21, 2005, 09:53:46 PM EST
         Woo and Yay! We're #466 in total credits (431.70). - (Another Scott) - (4) - Feb. 21, 2005, 10:05:47 PM EST
             Sorry, not happening. -NT - (broomberg) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2005, 07:12:58 PM EST
                 SAYS WHO? - (folkert) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 07:33:02 PM EST
                     :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 24, 2005, 07:43:00 PM EST
                 Thought so; doesn't hurt to ask. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 24, 2005, 07:43:50 PM EST
         But... There is no gravity. - (imric) - Feb. 21, 2005, 10:23:15 PM EST
         IWETHEY is team #367 now - 1196.13 cr. We're on the move... - (Another Scott) - (4) - Feb. 23, 2005, 08:08:01 AM EST
             I have 700 credits pending! -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Feb. 23, 2005, 08:16:26 AM EST
                 Muah! - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:02:44 AM EST
                     Why am I showing two machines? - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:54:31 AM EST
                         A FAQs addresses the Credits issue. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:00:50 PM EST
         I'm *so* pending. - (pwhysall) - (6) - Feb. 24, 2005, 07:55:16 AM EST
             Yeah what's with that? - (Meerkat) - (5) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:35:57 PM EST
                 And why isn't mine processing any more? - (drewk) - (4) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:38:33 PM EST
                     There's nothing in the Messages saying why it has stopped? - (Meerkat) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:49:38 PM EST
                         Says it suspended one and started another - (drewk) - Feb. 24, 2005, 09:13:57 PM EST
                     As I read your stats... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:57:51 PM EST
                         Each time I've started, it worked while I did - (drewk) - Feb. 24, 2005, 09:22:25 PM EST
         We're #306 now, at least as high as #302 earlier today. - (Another Scott) - (8) - Feb. 24, 2005, 11:34:18 PM EST
             If it weren't for pending results... - (Meerkat) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 06:54:00 AM EST
                 I'd like to think that... - (Another Scott) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:34:16 AM EST
             6th would be me - (Steven A S) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 02:42:18 PM EST
                 Woo and Yay! :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 25, 2005, 02:42:50 PM EST
             Tip I found while researching my problem - (drewk) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 09:50:34 PM EST
                 ! - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 10:06:31 PM EST
                     Ooh, must try -NT - (drewk) - Feb. 25, 2005, 10:11:35 PM EST
                 Just use the Boinc clients from... - (folkert) - Feb. 26, 2005, 10:04:32 AM EST
         Some interesting teams out there. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 03:47:14 PM EST
             I wonder if somebody is naked and famous? -NT - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2005, 05:12:36 PM EST
                 ICLRPD - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:56:14 PM EST
                     It's a Presidents of the United States of America song... - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 26, 2005, 12:46:46 AM EST
         Finally got some data - (SpiceWare) - Feb. 27, 2005, 05:39:15 PM EST
         Woo and Yay! We're #200! - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 27, 2005, 05:40:53 PM EST
             I'm one of the 2 - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2005, 12:14:15 AM EST
                 Neat! We'll soon take Estonia! :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 28, 2005, 12:30:16 AM EST