IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Windows vX.X Forum / Nope.
Post #192,922
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
2/3/05 4:35:17 PM
2/3/05 4:35:44 PM
Reply
New Nope.
I had this specific issue - unpingable XP box - and disabling the firewall did indeed allow pingage.

Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Collapse Edited by pwhysall Feb. 3, 2005, 04:35:44 PM EST
Nope.

Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Collapse All History
     Windows XP Pro doesn't answer pings even - (Andrew Grygus) - (20) - Feb. 2, 2005, 04:08:20 PM EST
         Have you tried the arp trick? - (jake123) - Feb. 2, 2005, 07:08:46 PM EST
         Post output of "ipconfig /all" -NT - (inthane-chan) - (8) - Feb. 2, 2005, 07:29:08 PM EST
             Don't have that in front of me now, but . . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Feb. 2, 2005, 10:04:48 PM EST
                 Just tried - (jbrabeck) - Feb. 2, 2005, 10:32:35 PM EST
                 Speaking of Norton crap - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2005, 12:17:35 AM EST
                     Well, Norton will make it slow right there . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Feb. 3, 2005, 01:16:52 AM EST
                 Here's a little problem - (Steve Lowe) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2005, 01:36:50 AM EST
                     They don't "wrap around" (so 322 would be = 67) ? -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 3, 2005, 02:14:34 AM EST
                     Ooops, type - is .122 - but that part works. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Feb. 3, 2005, 06:27:57 AM EST
                 You've probably got the long and the short of it. - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2005, 10:45:05 AM EST
         SP2? - (andread) - (9) - Feb. 3, 2005, 11:57:55 AM EST
             He specifically stated firewall is disabled. <EOM> -NT - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Feb. 3, 2005, 12:59:04 PM EST
                 Re: He specifically stated firewall is disabled. <EOM> - (andread) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2005, 04:33:57 PM EST
                     Nope. - (pwhysall) - Feb. 3, 2005, 04:35:44 PM EST
                     Well, it claims it isn't running and can't start. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2005, 05:05:34 PM EST
                         No vpn running? - (Silverlock) - Feb. 4, 2005, 08:30:25 AM EST
             SP2 Yes, but . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2005, 01:00:34 PM EST
                 Just spent a second night with an HP XP box - (drewk) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2005, 12:16:36 AM EST
                     Not typical - universal. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2005, 12:57:59 PM EST
                         Is a $50 hardware firewall good enough to stop this? (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Feb. 4, 2005, 02:31:31 PM EST

So let me sign off in idiocy...
153 ms