Sorry but.. (again)
Most 'issues' worth discussing at all - are rarely solvable via some succession of Authorized-facts or their little cousins, factoids.
You might wish it otherwise (and it seems - you do). Neither Google nor the Library of Congress possess sufficient Facts to solve most homo-sap problems du jour. For just one Factual Example: attribution of 'motive' is basic to our sysetem of 'justice' (another Duesy of a notion in its very concept). Now Shakespeare has given us a rich source of possible remedies - with nary a Fact being required - all one needs is to acquire Wisdom ;-)
Facts can.. settle some issues of time, place - and possible motive. But where human behavior is the 'issue' -- facts have damn little to do with events, except afterwards: is it a fact that such and such occurred. More examples? Start with Rashomon for a primer.
IMhO - it doesn't matter if your self-bestowed Logic Skills\ufffd are real or imagined factoids. Your view appears to be about duelling Facts and not about (as my Mater used to say) arriving at the truth of matters through discussion, or so it appears.
The Doberman Pinscher School of assertion? OK in a dogfight. If ya like discussing philosophy with dogs? Oh Alpha Male.
Ashton
Woof!
