IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Oh, so it was YOU!
Of the list you cite, how many are confined to this directory - and hence qualify as Active-X success stories?
Murdarah!!!
   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything
New rephrasing?
So, I guess I should rephrase it. How about teen speak -

Of the list you cite, how many are confined to this directory - and you know qualify as Active-X success stories?

or would you prefer a great white north spin -

Of the list you cite, how many are confined to this directory - and eh qualify as Active-X success stories?

Ok, so I'd need a bunch more 'you know's and 'eh's to make it realistic. How about a substitution of: thus; therefore; so; ergo; consequently; subsequently; correspondingly; accordingly? Any of those work and hence get me off the hook? :-)
New I take it you *do* know what I'm referring to
Da Crittah:
How about a substitution of: thus; therefore; so; ergo; consequently; subsequently; correspondingly; accordingly? Any of those work and hence get me off the hook? :-)
Well, yeah, they *would* have... Except, of course, you leapt back on it! :-)

Anyway, I assume you got the reference: It was to the Boulder (Wasn't it?), CO, Police Dept -- who claimed that someone's (her parents, IIRC?) use of that phrase "proved" that they were the ones who (abducted and later?) murdered that kid, Jon Benet Something (Ramsey?). (Having, in the interim, sent a ransom demand or something, containing the "unique" -- yeah, right! -- phrase "and hence".) You may have seen me, too, use it, only the other day -- I guess that I kind of reminded myself of it, then, and hence pounced on it now...

Anyway, that's the most moronic piece of police "evidence" I've ever heard of. Still pisses me off, apparently.
   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything
     J2EE vs. Microsoft.NET - (cforde) - (28)
         Security is simple either via net or java - (boxley) - (4)
             That is a procedural model of security - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                 Actually J2EE uses a declarative model - (bluke)
                 Hmmm...got any other links? - (tseliot) - (1)
                     Sorry... - (ben_tilly)
         .NET replays the ActiveX fiasco - (neelk) - (22)
             Side note. - (inthane-chan) - (7)
                 Muah. - (admin) - (2)
                     Moi, for one. -NT - (CRConrad)
                     Is most amusing. -NT - (static)
                 I don't get it... - (neelk) - (3)
                     I don't get it either. - (inthane-chan)
                     Kitchen sink... - (ChrisR)
                     I bet it's issues with the Virtual Machine. - (static)
             Re: .NET replays the ActiveX fiasco - (Squidley) - (13)
                 Interesting list - (ChrisR) - (7)
                     Oh, so it was YOU! - (CRConrad) - (2)
                         rephrasing? - (ChrisR) - (1)
                             I take it you *do* know what I'm referring to - (CRConrad)
                     Re: Interesting list - (Squidley) - (3)
                         Viruses and verified security holes - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                             Re: Viruses and verified security holes - (Squidley) - (1)
                                 ActiveX is actually one thing... - (Arkadiy)
                 Re: .NET replays the ActiveX fiasco - (neelk) - (3)
                     EzBug hangover? - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         Finger habits are hard to break. :) -NT - (neelk)
                     typo fix - (neelk)
                 Re: .NET replays the ActiveX fiasco - (pwhysall)

Travelling at the speed of light with the headlights on.
119 ms