IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Science Forum / Yes, but is it using good film?
Post #184,228
by drewk
Picture of drewk
11/15/04 11:37:55 PM
Reply
New Yes, but is it using good film?
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
Post #184,238
by folkert
Picture of folkert
11/16/04 8:54:34 AM
Reply
New No.
They are using the 40MP/cm^2 CCD.

:)
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
     You can't tell me this title wasn't intentional: - (admin) - (21) - Nov. 15, 2004, 07:45:07 PM EST
         This title wasn't intentional. - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2004, 08:30:35 PM EST
             Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk. -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:11:51 PM EST
         Kind of blows holes in Ranting Ross did... - (folkert) - (17) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:25:23 PM EST
             Actually, what he said was: - (admin) - (13) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:33:12 PM EST
                 Munch is so appropriate for that post. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:36:48 PM EST
                 Wow, 100K posts ago... Dam. - (folkert) - (11) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:38:40 PM EST
                     Not completely - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Nov. 15, 2004, 11:02:39 PM EST
                         You mean the "artificially colored shots of nebulae" -NT - (drewk) - Nov. 15, 2004, 11:16:59 PM EST
                         I think Ross is underestimating the cost of space-based - (admin) - (8) - Nov. 15, 2004, 11:23:55 PM EST
                             Yes, but is it using good film? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2004, 11:37:55 PM EST
                                 No. - (folkert) - Nov. 16, 2004, 08:54:34 AM EST
                             This is the whole thing I believe is blowing - (folkert) - Nov. 16, 2004, 08:54:52 AM EST
                             I don't think that Ross is estimating the cost at all - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 16, 2004, 04:21:09 PM EST
                                 It's a good reason. -NT - (imric) - (3) - Nov. 16, 2004, 04:33:49 PM EST
                                     Yes, a good reason... - (folkert) - (2) - Nov. 16, 2004, 05:02:10 PM EST
                                         But it isn't only those two jobs that Hubble is good for - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 16, 2004, 05:33:39 PM EST
                                         Adaptive optics is what he was - (imric) - Nov. 16, 2004, 05:42:34 PM EST
             Waste of money - (deSitter) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2004, 10:15:18 PM EST
                 Take some time off, but please come back. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 15, 2004, 10:22:19 PM EST
                 l8r. -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 15, 2004, 10:35:48 PM EST
         To reiterate - (deSitter) - Nov. 15, 2004, 10:13:51 PM EST

Damn, man, you swing a mean left field passive aggressive non sequitur.
46 ms