IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Science Forum / This title wasn't intentional.
Post #184,174
by drewk
Picture of drewk
11/15/04 8:30:35 PM
Reply
New This title wasn't intentional.
Well. Looks like I can tell you that.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
Post #184,194
by Another Scott
11/15/04 9:11:51 PM
Reply
New Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.
     You can't tell me this title wasn't intentional: - (admin) - (21) - Nov. 15, 2004, 07:45:07 PM EST
         This title wasn't intentional. - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2004, 08:30:35 PM EST
             Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk. -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:11:51 PM EST
         Kind of blows holes in Ranting Ross did... - (folkert) - (17) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:25:23 PM EST
             Actually, what he said was: - (admin) - (13) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:33:12 PM EST
                 Munch is so appropriate for that post. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:36:48 PM EST
                 Wow, 100K posts ago... Dam. - (folkert) - (11) - Nov. 15, 2004, 09:38:40 PM EST
                     Not completely - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Nov. 15, 2004, 11:02:39 PM EST
                         You mean the "artificially colored shots of nebulae" -NT - (drewk) - Nov. 15, 2004, 11:16:59 PM EST
                         I think Ross is underestimating the cost of space-based - (admin) - (8) - Nov. 15, 2004, 11:23:55 PM EST
                             Yes, but is it using good film? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2004, 11:37:55 PM EST
                                 No. - (folkert) - Nov. 16, 2004, 08:54:34 AM EST
                             This is the whole thing I believe is blowing - (folkert) - Nov. 16, 2004, 08:54:52 AM EST
                             I don't think that Ross is estimating the cost at all - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 16, 2004, 04:21:09 PM EST
                                 It's a good reason. -NT - (imric) - (3) - Nov. 16, 2004, 04:33:49 PM EST
                                     Yes, a good reason... - (folkert) - (2) - Nov. 16, 2004, 05:02:10 PM EST
                                         But it isn't only those two jobs that Hubble is good for - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 16, 2004, 05:33:39 PM EST
                                         Adaptive optics is what he was - (imric) - Nov. 16, 2004, 05:42:34 PM EST
             Waste of money - (deSitter) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2004, 10:15:18 PM EST
                 Take some time off, but please come back. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 15, 2004, 10:22:19 PM EST
                 l8r. -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 15, 2004, 10:35:48 PM EST
         To reiterate - (deSitter) - Nov. 15, 2004, 10:13:51 PM EST

Let Us Now Braise Famous Men, those who in their salad days.. imagined that they were of the Caesar variety.
48 ms