You know we enjoy teasing you. :-)
I think we've all learned a lot from you. Don't take our disagreements for lack of respect or affection. This would be a very boring place without you.
Cheers,
Scott.
You can't tell me this title wasn't intentional:
- (admin)
- (21)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 07:45:07 PM EST
This title wasn't intentional.
- (drewk)
- (1)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 08:30:35 PM EST
Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 09:11:51 PM EST
Kind of blows holes in Ranting Ross did...
- (folkert)
- (17)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 09:25:23 PM EST
Actually, what he said was:
- (admin)
- (13)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 09:33:12 PM EST
Munch is so appropriate for that post. :-)
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 09:36:48 PM EST
Wow, 100K posts ago... Dam.
- (folkert)
- (11)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 09:38:40 PM EST
Not completely
- (ben_tilly)
- (10)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 11:02:39 PM EST
You mean the "artificially colored shots of nebulae"
-NT
- (drewk)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 11:16:59 PM EST
I think Ross is underestimating the cost of space-based
- (admin)
- (8)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 11:23:55 PM EST
Yes, but is it using good film?
-NT
- (drewk)
- (1)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 11:37:55 PM EST
No.
- (folkert)
- Nov. 16, 2004, 08:54:34 AM EST
This is the whole thing I believe is blowing
- (folkert)
- Nov. 16, 2004, 08:54:52 AM EST
I don't think that Ross is estimating the cost at all
- (ben_tilly)
- (4)
- Nov. 16, 2004, 04:21:09 PM EST
It's a good reason.
-NT
- (imric)
- (3)
- Nov. 16, 2004, 04:33:49 PM EST
Yes, a good reason...
- (folkert)
- (2)
- Nov. 16, 2004, 05:02:10 PM EST
But it isn't only those two jobs that Hubble is good for
- (ben_tilly)
- Nov. 16, 2004, 05:33:39 PM EST
Adaptive optics is what he was
- (imric)
- Nov. 16, 2004, 05:42:34 PM EST
Waste of money
- (deSitter)
- (2)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 10:15:18 PM EST
Take some time off, but please come back.
- (Another Scott)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 10:22:19 PM EST
l8r.
-NT
- (folkert)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 10:35:48 PM EST
To reiterate
- (deSitter)
- Nov. 15, 2004, 10:13:51 PM EST