IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Can I play?
Let's see. Bill makes a statement that is plausibly true. A strict reading of the words he used can't be said to be horribly out of line with reality. But "everyone" on the other side of the debate "knows" what he "really means" by it, and gets really worked up by it.

Now in this case, he's using the code words designed to get liberals all worked up, to the point they really want to participate. Whether it's really his position doesn't matter. Whether his position is strictly defsensible doesn't matter. What matters is that by using the right buzzwords and playing the right tune, he's got people worked up and interested in expressing an opinion.

What might happen if someone who really does this for a living decides to play the same tune, but in a minor key, and using their opponents' words for lyrics?


Do I win the kewpie doll, Bill?
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New "Code words"
Gotta love those neo-con code words ;-)

My training in this posting methodology came at the hands of a former member and nemesis.

But if you really want a kewpie doll....
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Yup, Brandioch would nail you at the outset.. stead o' in
dribbles.

I prefer the nibbling to death by ducks.. as antidote to your nibbling to death by scripted imprecision.

(Especially in your seeing no major distinction between Kerry and Shrub - now There's a Rorschak if there ever were one, sans inkblots: ab=ba; digital Laffer Curve R'Us)
     Banning Gay Marriage - (tuberculosis) - (40)
         Want to clarify that? - (bepatient) - (39)
             That's BS, and you know it - (ben_tilly) - (16)
                 Man. - (bepatient) - (15)
                     Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness - (Silverlock) - (3)
                         Nope. - (bepatient)
                         Bill provides valuable counterpoint - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                             Sometimes that's on purpose. - (bepatient)
                     Where to begin? - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                         Yes and no. - (bepatient) - (9)
                             Can I play? - (drewk) - (2)
                                 "Code words" - (bepatient) - (1)
                                     Yup, Brandioch would nail you at the outset.. stead o' in - (Ashton)
                             We part company at the third sentence - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                                 And I think you overestimate... - (bepatient) - (4)
                                     And here's my belief - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                         To what end? - (bepatient) - (2)
                                             Benefits and obligations go hand in hand - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                                 We both agree... - (bepatient)
             OK - (tuberculosis) - (21)
                 Better. - (bepatient) - (7)
                     That sentence is too long - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                         Thats a universal -NT - (bepatient)
                     Marriage should be meaningless then... - (xtensive) - (1)
                         This, I agree with. -NT - (imric)
                     Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway. - (Simon_Jester) - (2)
                         Re: Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway. - (Yendor) - (1)
                             Sorry for the delay.... - (Simon_Jester)
                 I would vote against that - (daemon) - (12)
                     Why should I care that *you* were married in a courthouse? -NT - (drewk) - (1)
                         I wasnt, I dont beleive in state marriages for anyone, -NT - (daemon)
                     We've been down this road before - (ben_tilly) - (9)
                         married by Ashton Brown would suffice - (daemon) - (8)
                             Speaking of Ashton... (new thread) - (Nightowl)
                             more I think about it the more - (daemon) - (5)
                                 In which case... - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                     already said that a couple of posts up :-) -NT - (daemon)
                                     Re: In which case... - (CraigB) - (2)
                                         It could always be made more complicated. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                             This fine Human suggestion is____entirely too___*sane* - (Ashton)
                             As a Reverend in the Universal Life Church - (Ashton)

I have a cunning plan...
68 ms