IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Marriage should be meaningless then...
Post #183,584
by xtensive
Picture of xtensive
11/8/04 5:42:11 PM
Reply
New Marriage should be meaningless then...
... in the legal sense, anyway.

If you want a religious marriage, fine. But it will bestow no legal rights upon you. For gay and hetero alike, you'll be forced to have a "civil union" if you want all the rights conferred therein.

When a hetero couple says they're married, "Yeah, so, are you legally bound?"

thanks
mx.
"I'm man enough to tell you that I can't put my finger on
exactly what my philosophy is now, but I'm flexible."
-- Malcolm X
Post #183,588
by imric
11/8/04 5:50:21 PM
Reply
New This, I agree with.
Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
     Banning Gay Marriage - (tuberculosis) - (40) - Nov. 8, 2004, 12:51:47 PM EST
         Want to clarify that? - (bepatient) - (39) - Nov. 8, 2004, 12:56:24 PM EST
             That's BS, and you know it - (ben_tilly) - (16) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:11:54 PM EST
                 Man. - (bepatient) - (15) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:26:09 PM EST
                     Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness - (Silverlock) - (3) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:06:09 PM EST
                         Nope. - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:40:02 PM EST
                         Bill provides valuable counterpoint - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:52:29 PM EST
                             Sometimes that's on purpose. - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:56:19 PM EST
                     Where to begin? - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Nov. 8, 2004, 08:35:46 PM EST
                         Yes and no. - (bepatient) - (9) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:13:08 PM EST
                             Can I play? - (drewk) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 10:13:44 PM EST
                                 "Code words" - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:51:57 PM EST
                                     Yup, Brandioch would nail you at the outset.. stead o' in - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 12:29:24 AM EST
                             We part company at the third sentence - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Nov. 8, 2004, 10:47:50 PM EST
                                 And I think you overestimate... - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:48:19 PM EST
                                     And here's my belief - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:17:26 PM EST
                                         To what end? - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2004, 05:59:47 PM EST
                                             Benefits and obligations go hand in hand - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 07:59:43 PM EST
                                                 We both agree... - (bepatient) - Nov. 10, 2004, 02:26:19 PM EST
             OK - (tuberculosis) - (21) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:20:29 PM EST
                 Better. - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:33:12 PM EST
                     That sentence is too long - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:29:33 PM EST
                         Thats a universal -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:39:05 PM EST
                     Marriage should be meaningless then... - (xtensive) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:42:11 PM EST
                         This, I agree with. -NT - (imric) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:50:21 PM EST
                     Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway. - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:51:25 PM EST
                         Re: Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway. - (Yendor) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 09:10:31 AM EST
                             Sorry for the delay.... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:30:09 PM EST
                 I would vote against that - (daemon) - (12) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:25:26 PM EST
                     Why should I care that *you* were married in a courthouse? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:28:39 PM EST
                         I wasnt, I dont beleive in state marriages for anyone, -NT - (daemon) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:34:25 PM EST
                     We've been down this road before - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:05:12 PM EST
                         married by Ashton Brown would suffice - (daemon) - (8) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:04:19 AM EST
                             Speaking of Ashton... (new thread) - (Nightowl) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:09:20 AM EST
                             more I think about it the more - (daemon) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:12:53 AM EST
                                 In which case... - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:12:45 PM EST
                                     already said that a couple of posts up :-) -NT - (daemon) - Nov. 9, 2004, 01:24:28 PM EST
                                     Re: In which case... - (CraigB) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2004, 06:56:02 PM EST
                                         It could always be made more complicated. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 07:40:16 PM EST
                                             This fine Human suggestion is____entirely too___*sane* - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 01:10:01 AM EST
                             As a Reverend in the Universal Life Church - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 01:02:14 AM EST

I have a phone that doesn't ring, a line that doesn't sting, a letter never sent... I have a dream where snowflakes fall inside a painted hall... HA! THAT DON'T PAY THE RENT!
118 ms