IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Politics Forum
/
Nope.
Post #183,523
by
bepatient
11/8/04 2:40:02 PM
Reply
Nope.
But it wouldn't be the same unless you rolled out at least one ad hominem.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.
Fudd's First Law of Opposition
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Banning Gay Marriage
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (40)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 12:51:47 PM EST
Want to clarify that?
- (
bepatient
)
- (39)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 12:56:24 PM EST
That's BS, and you know it
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (16)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 01:11:54 PM EST
Man.
- (
bepatient
)
- (15)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 01:26:09 PM EST
Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness
- (
Silverlock
)
- (3)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 02:06:09 PM EST
Nope.
- (
bepatient
)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 02:40:02 PM EST
Bill provides valuable counterpoint
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (1)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 03:52:29 PM EST
Sometimes that's on purpose.
- (
bepatient
)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 03:56:19 PM EST
Where to begin?
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (10)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 08:35:46 PM EST
Yes and no.
- (
bepatient
)
- (9)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 09:13:08 PM EST
Can I play?
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 10:13:44 PM EST
"Code words"
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 11:51:57 PM EST
Yup, Brandioch would nail you at the outset.. stead o' in
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 12, 2004, 12:29:24 AM EST
We part company at the third sentence
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (5)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 10:47:50 PM EST
And I think you overestimate...
- (
bepatient
)
- (4)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 11:48:19 PM EST
And here's my belief
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (3)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 12:17:26 PM EST
To what end?
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 05:59:47 PM EST
Benefits and obligations go hand in hand
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (1)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 07:59:43 PM EST
We both agree...
- (
bepatient
)
- Nov. 10, 2004, 02:26:19 PM EST
OK
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (21)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 01:20:29 PM EST
Better.
- (
bepatient
)
- (7)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 01:33:12 PM EST
That sentence is too long
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (1)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 02:29:33 PM EST
Thats a universal
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 02:39:05 PM EST
Marriage should be meaningless then...
- (
xtensive
)
- (1)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 05:42:11 PM EST
This, I agree with.
-NT
- (
imric
)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 05:50:21 PM EST
Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway.
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (2)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 05:51:25 PM EST
Re: Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway.
- (
Yendor
)
- (1)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 09:10:31 AM EST
Sorry for the delay....
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- Nov. 22, 2004, 10:30:09 PM EST
I would vote against that
- (
daemon
)
- (12)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 05:25:26 PM EST
Why should I care that *you* were married in a courthouse?
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 05:28:39 PM EST
I wasnt, I dont beleive in state marriages for anyone,
-NT
- (
daemon
)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 05:34:25 PM EST
We've been down this road before
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (9)
- Nov. 8, 2004, 09:05:12 PM EST
married by Ashton Brown would suffice
- (
daemon
)
- (8)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 12:04:19 AM EST
Speaking of Ashton... (new thread)
- (
Nightowl
)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 12:09:20 AM EST
more I think about it the more
- (
daemon
)
- (5)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 12:12:53 AM EST
In which case...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (4)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 12:12:45 PM EST
already said that a couple of posts up :-)
-NT
- (
daemon
)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 01:24:28 PM EST
Re: In which case...
- (
CraigB
)
- (2)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 06:56:02 PM EST
It could always be made more complicated.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- Nov. 9, 2004, 07:40:16 PM EST
This fine Human suggestion is____entirely too___*sane*
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 12, 2004, 01:10:01 AM EST
As a Reverend in the Universal Life Church
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 12, 2004, 01:02:14 AM EST
i
we
they
.org
I know this because my t-shirt tells me so.
57 ms