Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #183,512 by Silverlock 11/8/04 2:06:09 PM Reply	Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness The projection is quite amusing. All that was missing was accusing them of being dismissive and sarcastic. ----------------------------------------- How do you convince a Washington Journalist that you're not slapping him in the face? Tell him you're not.
Post #183,523 by bepatient 11/8/04 2:40:02 PM Reply	Nope. But it wouldn't be the same unless you rolled out at least one ad hominem. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #183,549 by tuberculosis 11/8/04 3:52:29 PM Reply	Bill provides valuable counterpoint although he sometimes leaves the actual statement of his point as an exercise for the reader. Kind of like a fortune cookie. "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." --Albert Einstein "This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses." --George W. Bush
Post #183,551 by bepatient 11/8/04 3:56:19 PM Reply	Sometimes that's on purpose. and sometimes I spend a couple dozen posts paying the price for it ;-) If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Banning Gay Marriage - (tuberculosis) - (40) - Nov. 8, 2004, 12:51:47 PM EST

Want to clarify that? - (bepatient) - (39) - Nov. 8, 2004, 12:56:24 PM EST

That's BS, and you know it - (ben_tilly) - (16) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:11:54 PM EST

Man. - (bepatient) - (15) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:26:09 PM EST

Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness - (Silverlock) - (3) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:06:09 PM EST

Nope. - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:40:02 PM EST

Bill provides valuable counterpoint - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:52:29 PM EST

Sometimes that's on purpose. - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:56:19 PM EST

Where to begin? - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Nov. 8, 2004, 08:35:46 PM EST

Yes and no. - (bepatient) - (9) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:13:08 PM EST

Can I play? - (drewk) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 10:13:44 PM EST

"Code words" - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:51:57 PM EST

Yup, Brandioch would nail you at the outset.. stead o' in - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 12:29:24 AM EST

We part company at the third sentence - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Nov. 8, 2004, 10:47:50 PM EST

And I think you overestimate... - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:48:19 PM EST

And here's my belief - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:17:26 PM EST

To what end? - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2004, 05:59:47 PM EST

Benefits and obligations go hand in hand - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 07:59:43 PM EST

We both agree... - (bepatient) - Nov. 10, 2004, 02:26:19 PM EST

OK - (tuberculosis) - (21) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:20:29 PM EST

Better. - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:33:12 PM EST

That sentence is too long - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:29:33 PM EST

Thats a universal -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:39:05 PM EST

Marriage should be meaningless then... - (xtensive) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:42:11 PM EST

This, I agree with. -NT - (imric) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:50:21 PM EST

Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway. - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:51:25 PM EST

Re: Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway. - (Yendor) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 09:10:31 AM EST

Sorry for the delay.... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:30:09 PM EST

I would vote against that - (daemon) - (12) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:25:26 PM EST

Why should I care that *you* were married in a courthouse? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:28:39 PM EST

I wasnt, I dont beleive in state marriages for anyone, -NT - (daemon) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:34:25 PM EST

We've been down this road before - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:05:12 PM EST

married by Ashton Brown would suffice - (daemon) - (8) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:04:19 AM EST

Speaking of Ashton... (new thread) - (Nightowl) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:09:20 AM EST

more I think about it the more - (daemon) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:12:53 AM EST

In which case... - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:12:45 PM EST

already said that a couple of posts up :-) -NT - (daemon) - Nov. 9, 2004, 01:24:28 PM EST

Re: In which case... - (CraigB) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2004, 06:56:02 PM EST

It could always be made more complicated. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 07:40:16 PM EST

This fine Human suggestion is____entirely too___*sane* - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 01:10:01 AM EST

As a Reverend in the Universal Life Church - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 01:02:14 AM EST

They're a cornered rat, and quite frankly, I think they have rabies to boot. I'd rather not get too close to them.
62 ms