IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Not when you include a jammer
Assuming it was a receiver, that's one signal that they would take any available precautions to avoid having it intercepted. If that requires a jammer device they'd use it.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Frequency hopping would take care of that. ;-)
     NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate - (Ashton) - (10)
         Kerry ad... - (admin) - (1)
             Bad tailoring - (GBert)
         Playing Devil's Advocate. - (Another Scott) - (7)
             Playing Devil's Advocate to your Devil's Advocate - (admin) - (1)
                 Bush's speech patterns have been odd since ... ;-) - (Another Scott)
             Could be the "1/0" switch -NT - (deSitter) - (2)
                 No, no. It's an Invisible Fence collar. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     ROFArfing -NT - (deSitter)
             Not when you include a jammer - (drewk) - (1)
                 Frequency hopping would take care of that. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)

I am LRPD, DESTROYER OF EVIL!
46 ms