IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 1
active user
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
News Picks Forum
/
Not when you include a jammer
Post #181,642
by
drewk
10/29/04 10:40:18 AM
Reply
Not when you include a jammer
Assuming it was a receiver, that's one signal that they would take any available precautions to avoid having it intercepted. If that requires a jammer device they'd use it.
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #181,644
by
Another Scott
10/29/04 10:41:51 AM
Reply
Frequency hopping would take care of that. ;-)
NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate
- (
Ashton
)
- (10)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 05:01:48 AM EDT
Kerry ad...
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 09:23:06 AM EDT
Bad tailoring
- (
GBert
)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 09:39:46 AM EDT
Playing Devil's Advocate.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (7)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 10:19:26 AM EDT
Playing Devil's Advocate to your Devil's Advocate
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 10:24:16 AM EDT
Bush's speech patterns have been odd since ... ;-)
- (
Another Scott
)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 10:36:31 AM EDT
Could be the "1/0" switch
-NT
- (
deSitter
)
- (2)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 10:32:15 AM EDT
No, no. It's an Invisible Fence collar.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 10:40:27 AM EDT
ROFArfing
-NT
- (
deSitter
)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 10:42:02 AM EDT
Not when you include a jammer
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 10:40:18 AM EDT
Frequency hopping would take care of that. ;-)
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- Oct. 29, 2004, 10:41:51 AM EDT
i
we
they
.org
I am LRPD, DESTROYER OF EVIL!
46 ms