Apparently Edwards won slightly

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #178,020 by ben_tilly 10/6/04 12:41:56 PM Reply	Apparently Edwards won slightly I'd also call it a draw. But [link\|http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/08/politics/main641817.shtml\|http://www.cbsnews.c.../main641817.shtml] says that of 178 undecided voters, 41% thought that Edwards won, and 28% thought that Cheney won. The rest called it a draw. That'd be an Edwards victory in the only audience that matters. An online poll (yeah, I know the problems) at [link\|http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/\|http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/] also calls it an Edwards victory (at the moment 59% to 41%). One amusing point: Cheney did a better job of defending Bush's policies than Bush did. Not totally surprising since they're actually mostly Cheney's policies... Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #178,041 by daemon 10/6/04 5:49:16 PM Reply	the polls are cranked. I received an email on the eve of the vote from Joe Lockheart with all the links to vote on the debate and how to come off as an undecided while doing so. Immediately after the debate another email urging more of the same. Repos also doing the same thing. regards, daemon
Post #178,046 by admin 10/6/04 6:00:35 PM Reply	That's only the online polls. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

Edwards is losing - (deSitter) - (27) - Oct. 5, 2004, 10:25:11 PM EDT

Lot of flailing going on - (JayMehaffey) - (17) - Oct. 5, 2004, 10:43:19 PM EDT

They talked past each other. - (Another Scott) - (15) - Oct. 5, 2004, 11:22:16 PM EDT

Re: They talked past each other. - (deSitter) - (8) - Oct. 5, 2004, 11:27:41 PM EDT

Your planet? - (rcareaga) - (6) - Oct. 5, 2004, 11:36:38 PM EDT

Re: Your planet? - (deSitter) - (5) - Oct. 5, 2004, 11:45:02 PM EDT

"You're a Senator?" - (rcareaga) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:06:56 AM EDT

Cheney's been in the bunker for too long. -NT - (ChrisR) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:36:45 AM EDT

Re: "You're a Senator?" - (jb4) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:38:16 AM EDT

That particular phrase - (Arkadiy) - Oct. 6, 2004, 11:06:26 AM EDT

Sen Leahy spoke after the debate to NBC - (tuberculosis) - Oct. 6, 2004, 12:38:40 PM EDT

No, underdog lost. Twins won. :-) -NT - (jbrabeck) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:23:24 AM EDT

Format is intentionally warped - (JayMehaffey) - (4) - Oct. 6, 2004, 12:01:25 AM EDT

Ideal situation is to ditch the moderator completely... - (ChrisR) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2004, 12:08:54 AM EDT

Could be interesting - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2004, 12:25:03 AM EDT

Re: Could be interesting - (Yendor) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:20:49 AM EDT

Re: Ideal situation is to ditch the moderator completely... - (deSitter) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:37:36 AM EDT

WashPost take. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 6, 2004, 08:24:22 AM EDT

Wot 'ee said. - (inthane-chan) - Oct. 5, 2004, 11:23:28 PM EDT

Nah, in the end, it's pretty much a tie. - (a6l6e6x) - Oct. 5, 2004, 11:35:00 PM EDT

Not the debate I watched. - (Ashton) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2004, 03:34:28 AM EDT

Thank you. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 09:38:15 AM EDT

No, I've read a few comments about that. - (admin) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2004, 09:40:58 AM EDT

Ah. Okay. But there was one Edwards flub of note, imo. - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 6, 2004, 10:27:21 AM EDT

I called it a draw -NT - (tuberculosis) - Oct. 6, 2004, 12:23:44 PM EDT

Apparently Edwards won slightly - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2004, 12:41:56 PM EDT

the polls are cranked. - (daemon) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2004, 05:49:16 PM EDT

That's only the online polls. -NT - (admin) - Oct. 6, 2004, 06:00:35 PM EDT

When you're as high-strung as I am, you should be paid to keep smoking.
150 ms