IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / News Picks Forum / There is no "art of digital photography".
Post #177,382
by mmoffitt
10/1/04 4:44:01 PM
Reply
New There is no "art of digital photography".
Point, click .... perfect for the Nintendo Generation.
bcnu,
Mikem

"The struggle for the emancipation of the working class is not between races or religions. It is one of class against class. Every trace of anti-Semitism, or any form of race hatred cannot assist the oppressed, it can on the contrary only aid the exploiters. Workers of all nationality, religion or creed must stand together against the common enemy: capitalism."
-Ted Grant
Post #177,387
by imric
10/1/04 4:54:00 PM
Reply
New I'm sure
That the same was said of photography - when compared to say, painting or sculpture.
Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
     Another great photographer goes down - (deSitter) - (21) - Oct. 1, 2004, 03:22:46 PM EDT
         What are you talking about? - (bepatient) - (20) - Oct. 1, 2004, 03:37:59 PM EDT
             Oh, please. - (mmoffitt) - (19) - Oct. 1, 2004, 04:36:47 PM EDT
                 So is film, the bits are just smaller -NT - (drewk) - (2) - Oct. 1, 2004, 04:42:03 PM EDT
                     There is no "art of digital photography". - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2004, 04:44:01 PM EDT
                         I'm sure - (imric) - Oct. 1, 2004, 04:54:00 PM EDT
                 Know any photographers? - (bepatient) - (13) - Oct. 1, 2004, 05:06:03 PM EDT
                     Complete agreement. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 1, 2004, 05:15:40 PM EDT
                         The only difference is permanency - (lincoln) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2004, 06:28:06 PM EDT
                             Known issue for all digital media - (drewk) - Oct. 1, 2004, 07:43:22 PM EDT
                     That reminds me.... - (n3jja) - Oct. 1, 2004, 06:54:37 PM EDT
                     Re: Know any photographers? - (deSitter) - (8) - Oct. 2, 2004, 02:54:00 PM EDT
                         You're aware that AA did tricks, right? - (Another Scott) - (6) - Oct. 2, 2004, 03:30:30 PM EDT
                             I ?think? this was my entire point -NT - (deSitter) - (5) - Oct. 3, 2004, 02:46:16 AM EDT
                                 Seemed the opposite to me. But ... - (Another Scott) - (4) - Oct. 3, 2004, 10:45:27 AM EDT
                                     Well of course - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 3, 2004, 02:22:11 PM EDT
                                         But with the true masterpiece - (bepatient) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2004, 02:40:26 PM EDT
                                             That only shows - (jake123) - Oct. 3, 2004, 03:34:48 PM EDT
                                     A nice clarification of McL's subtlety.. - (Ashton) - Oct. 4, 2004, 05:56:47 AM EDT
                         Bull-pucky - (bepatient) - Oct. 2, 2004, 03:31:20 PM EDT
                 And the horse you - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2004, 05:40:47 PM EDT
                     Cousin said it best. - (bepatient) - Oct. 1, 2004, 08:51:07 PM EDT

...introduce an "if", and you're down the slippery slope. You add "for", and it's an avalanche. Then the "while" falls on you, and you're buried.
39 ms