Re: What I meant was ...

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #173,766 by admin 9/12/04 12:10:39 PM Reply	Re: What I meant was ... As I said, I hit Javadocs 3 to 4 times a day. Jump to another class: it's in there. I don't use it because I find the dired mode more useful. I've used several IDEs with syntax checkers. The utility compared to simple highlighting is not a large delta, compared to everything I'd lose if I stopped using emacs. I believe someone's written an incremental compile mode for emacs, too. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #173,770 by bluke 9/12/04 12:17:03 PM Reply	I never really used Emacs ... so I can't compare. From everything I have heard Emacs is tremendously productive. Note, the developers at Infoworld are using Ultraedit and VI (as well as Emacs). There is no way that VI or Ultraedit is as productive.
Post #173,772 by admin 9/12/04 12:19:08 PM Reply	No argument there. Simple text editors are a bad joke. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #173,789 by Simon_Jester 9/12/04 2:28:09 PM Reply	But if they're using VIM and calling it VI then I would have to disagree. VIM has syntax checking (nice pretty colors to show you your errors). The only thing that an IDE has that VIM doesn't (for me), is a nice way to profile the code so that I could tell what sections of code were taking the longest.

Do you use an IDE? - (bluke) - (63) - Sept. 12, 2004, 09:02:40 AM EDT

I use emacs - (admin) - (17) - Sept. 12, 2004, 09:43:15 AM EDT

That was just 1 example - (bluke) - (9) - Sept. 12, 2004, 10:10:02 AM EDT

Re: That was just 1 example - (admin) - (8) - Sept. 12, 2004, 11:56:29 AM EDT

What I meant was ... - (bluke) - (4) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:07:39 PM EDT

Re: What I meant was ... - (admin) - (3) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:10:39 PM EDT

I never really used Emacs ... - (bluke) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:17:03 PM EDT

No argument there. - (admin) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:19:08 PM EDT

But if they're using VIM and calling it VI - (Simon_Jester) - Sept. 12, 2004, 02:28:09 PM EDT

I find the prefix to be distracting - (bluke) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:11:09 PM EDT

That would work as well. -NT - (admin) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:14:43 PM EDT

Use leading underscores for ivars - less distracting - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:29:38 AM EDT

Little features won me over - (bluke) - (6) - Sept. 12, 2004, 10:22:58 AM EDT

Re: Little features won me over - (admin) - (5) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:06:34 PM EDT

I am only doing Java now - (bluke) - (3) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:14:28 PM EDT

Re: I am only doing Java now - (admin) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:17:32 PM EDT

I do browse jars ... - (bluke) - (1) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:28:50 PM EDT

How about embedded ones? - (admin) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:29:37 PM EDT

ICLRPD (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:50:20 PM EDT

I'm bouncing back and forth on this. - (broomberg) - (36) - Sept. 12, 2004, 11:16:06 AM EDT

There is no question ... - (bluke) - (30) - Sept. 12, 2004, 11:41:07 AM EDT

OK - (broomberg) - (29) - Sept. 12, 2004, 11:50:05 AM EDT

Not that I am selling Intellij ... - (bluke) - (28) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:02:54 PM EDT

Doubt it - (broomberg) - (27) - Sept. 12, 2004, 12:39:55 PM EDT

Most of my typing is inserting text. - (admin) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2004, 04:47:28 PM EDT

ed is the standard text editor. -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Sept. 12, 2004, 04:57:21 PM EDT

? -NT - (admin) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:14:41 PM EDT

Modes are evil. - (FuManChu) - (23) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:23:42 PM EDT

? -NT - (pwhysall) - (14) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:24:28 PM EDT

? RTFA - (FuManChu) - (13) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:25:41 PM EDT

? -NT - (pwhysall) - (8) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:29:00 PM EDT

Love ya man -NT - (FuManChu) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:36:17 PM EDT

Type faster, Barry! :D -NT - (FuManChu) - (1) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:38:50 PM EDT

Huh? -NT - (broomberg) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:45:30 PM EDT

I did RTFA - (broomberg) - (4) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:44:09 PM EDT

? - (pwhysall) - (3) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:51:15 PM EDT

? - (FuManChu) - (1) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:55:38 PM EDT

Footpedal - (altmann) - Sept. 13, 2004, 03:07:28 AM EDT

Yup - (broomberg) - Sept. 12, 2004, 06:04:15 PM EDT

? -NT - (admin) - (3) - Sept. 12, 2004, 05:29:04 PM EDT

??? -NT - (Yendor) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2004, 07:58:46 PM EDT

???? -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 12, 2004, 08:23:46 PM EDT

!!! -NT - (Yendor) - Sept. 12, 2004, 08:36:16 PM EDT

Modals wobble but they don't fall down. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Sept. 12, 2004, 08:52:24 PM EDT

ROfsckingFL! - (jb4) - (6) - Sept. 13, 2004, 05:52:22 PM EDT

Yep, teco was great. - (admin) - Sept. 13, 2004, 09:33:03 PM EDT

In that case - (broomberg) - (4) - Sept. 13, 2004, 09:49:46 PM EDT

Wuss - (pwhysall) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:34:17 AM EDT

Oh dear -- you woke Peter up. :-D -NT - (static) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 01:00:40 AM EDT

Stalker! -NT - (pwhysall) - Sept. 14, 2004, 01:02:20 AM EDT

Used both... - (jb4) - Sept. 14, 2004, 04:25:49 PM EDT

VI keys. - (static) - (3) - Sept. 12, 2004, 08:38:39 PM EDT

I have heard this many times but never understood it - (bluke) - (2) - Sept. 13, 2004, 02:53:08 AM EDT

Refocus down just a little bit. - (static) - Sept. 13, 2004, 03:42:10 AM EDT

For me? - (Simon_Jester) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:14:46 PM EDT

IDEA for Java - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:29:40 AM EDT

The refactor tools are good - (ChrisR) - Sept. 12, 2004, 01:37:13 PM EDT

Call it a terminology mismatch, then - (FuManChu) - (4) - Sept. 12, 2004, 10:37:12 PM EDT

But that is what I use it for! - (broomberg) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2004, 10:51:12 PM EDT

How about this - (drewk) - (1) - Sept. 13, 2004, 12:08:18 AM EDT

Mostly. - (FuManChu) - Sept. 13, 2004, 12:33:42 AM EDT

Maybe - (bluke) - Sept. 13, 2004, 02:43:31 AM EDT

I don't either - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 13, 2004, 12:22:57 PM EDT

I think I put my finger on it - (drewk) - Sept. 13, 2004, 10:48:19 PM EDT

Juan Valdez has the answer...
143 ms