Re: Learn some bloody history, woman!

Post #167,065 by Nightowl 8/1/04 11:05:34 PM Reply	Re: Learn some bloody history, woman! The Pilgrims came after 1600 years of Christian history. I've already explained numerous times I was seeing the beginning of "Christianity" i.e. the departure from the Church of England, as the U.S. version, not the Old Testament. I also explained why I viewed his post as "bashing" and why some parts of it still come across that way. It certainly can't be viewed as a positive post about Christianity. I was just pointing out I was a little tired of hearing all the negativity about religion. I know a lot of history, just never focused on religious history or political really. I focused on military history. Not every human being, even if they learned it ALL in school is expected to remember every fact in history, and that includes me. I observed something, I made a comment, we've resolved it, time to move along, nothing to see here. :) Nightowl >8# Note to self: Find new signature soon.
Post #167,071 by ben_tilly 8/1/04 11:23:04 PM Reply	Still no excuse The fact that Andrew talked about thousand year period and Roman baths made it utterly clear that he was talking about a time period that is longer than US history, and he was talking about something that was nowhere near the New World. (Assuming, that is, that you have a rough idea where Rome is.) If you knew any dates at all on the relevant events, this would have been abundantly clear to you. But even if you were completely clueless as to what events Andrew was talking about, you could have asked! Not knowing something is unavoidable - as you say we are all in that position from time to time. But jumping down someone's throat because they stated facts you were unaware of is avoidable, and should be avoided. How you avoid it is simple - if what that person says makes no sense to you, give them the benefit of the doubt and ask for clarification. When people make stuff up, you can figure that out and call them on it later. When people are referring to stuff which you just didn't happen to know, you can find out more without causing this kind of problem for yourself. So remember this for for next time: there was no excuse for your behaviour. When you don't know, ask before assuming the worst. Particularly if the person who is making comments (Andrew) happens to be someone who is known to know a lot of odd things. Regards, Ben To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Post #167,073 by Nightowl 8/1/04 11:25:48 PM 8/1/04 11:27:26 PM Reply	I didn't jump down anyone's throat. I made a semi-sarcastic comment, with a wink included, meaning I wasn't upset or anything. If you choose to take it differently, that's your problem. Edit: And I've already clarified and handled the mix-up with Andrew in the Religion Forum. I don't ask as much on here as I used to, because when I do it now, people tend to ridicule me for asking. Nightowl >8# Note to self: Find new signature soon. Edited by Nightowl Aug. 1, 2004, 11:27:26 PM EDT Expand All History

Welcome to IWETHEY!