Post #166,787
7/30/04 1:39:01 PM
|
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, etc.
[link|http://www.nps.gov/malu/documents/jim_crow_laws.htm|http://www.nps.gov/m...jim_crow_laws.htm] which is pretty amazing.
A sampling "The Blind - The board of trustees shall...maintain a separate building...on separate ground for the admission, care, instruction, and support of all blind persons of the colored or black race. Louisiana" Even people who don't know (at least can't SEE) that they are black...
I guess it's very possible that he could remember Jim Crow growing up in South Carolina at a young (and impressionable) age. Somehow, I thought he was younger. Didn't get a chance to watch his Biography or any of the other cult classic mythology as I have two young kids at home competing for my time.
I was wrong...
What's really amazing to me as an outside observer to this whole process is how cultlike this whole process is. Having watched Kerry last night (who I'm mildly impressed with), it seemed that hope really is on the way. You see, American people "want to be told the truth!" (Ashton, you paying attention?). Guess who has the Truth? And a kinder and gentler machine gun hand to boot?
Ah.... the noise. I actually feel sorry for non-democratic countries - they miss out on the "material" every four years - Ass clowns on parade... Hup 2, 3, 4.
Hi ho. And so on...
Just a few thoughts,
Danno
|
Post #166,843
7/30/04 9:41:14 PM
|
the cult: this just in
Sociologists and political scientists recently announced the discovery of a "mass-movement" psychology which, if verified by further research and analysis, bids fair to account for the tendency of the Teeming Millions to project their hopes, desires, anxieties, etc. onto so-called "public figures."
People drink the Kool-Aid. You knew that already. It's not a Republican-Democrat thing: the administration's party will presently mount such demonstrations on behalf of its Dear Leader as might cause the cheeks of a Caesar or a pharaoh to redden for very shame. This sort of thing has been going on for a long time, although the regime at present in power seems to have brought the Cult of the Commander-in-Chief to a pitch not hitherto approached among the notional Anglo-Saxons since the wet dreams of Charles II.
If permitted to be elected (if I felt certain that it would be a fair fight, i.e., the election conducted with neither widespread purging of the voter rolls, nor Republican operatives garbed in SWATlike attire arrayed for purposes of intimidation at selected polling places, nor Diebold-like chicanery—"the dog ate my election"—I would be prepared to bet on a substantial Kerry victory) JK is obviously not going to be, as some of his giddier partisans assume, the combined second comings of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Kennedy, Caesar Augustus, St. Francis of Assisi, Pope John XXIII and Sergeant York. That he will necessarily fall short of these inflated expectations, and that the Washington press corps, those corrupt and jaded courtiers, will give him a hard time for this purported failure beginning by next February 1 ought not astonish the grownups among us. I recently looked in on Kevin Drum's blog, wherein he had posed the question of whether a Bush victory this November might not be preferable, since the regime would then be obliged to clean up its own messes. Scores of responses made the obvious point that BushCo II wouldn't waste a heartbeat surveying the wreckage to date, but would rather commence with trebled energy and dedication to producing more of same.
I have no unrealistic expectations of a Kerry presidency, and will not fault him if he fails to produce the Earthly Paradise. It will suffice for him to cease breaking up the joint, something it is clear the incumbent has no intention of leaving off. Anything else is gravy.
cordially,
Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist.
|
Post #166,845
7/30/04 10:24:06 PM
|
Others had similar thoughts about the advantage of Bush win.
[link|http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/07/27/unions_might_be_better_off_with_kerry_loss_leader_says/|David Broder] opinion column: Breaking sharply with the enforced harmony of the Democratic National Convention, the president of the largest AFL-CIO union said yesterday that both organized labor and the Democratic Party might be better off in the long run if Senator John F. Kerry loses the presidential election.
Andrew Stern, head of the 1.6-million-member Service Employees International Union, or SEIU, said in an interview with The Washington Post that both the party and its longtime ally, the labor movement, are "in deep crisis," devoid of new ideas, and working with archaic structures.
Stern contended that another four years of Bush policies might be less damaging than the stifling of needed reform he said would occur if Kerry becomes president. He subsequently "clarified" or "revised and extended" his remarks... He's got a point. If liberals/progressives/whatever feel that they have no choice but vote for Kerry, then they'll have little clout with a Kerry administration (in the same way, as Bush pointed out, as African-Americans are taken for granted). And if Kerry wins, people will argue, "Hey we won! We don't need to change anything!" I'm rather pessimistic about the election this time around. I agree with [link|http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/07/30/rushed_speech_lost_opportunity/|Tom Oliphant] that Kerry blew a great opportunity (the speech was rushed, it was too poorly edited, etc.), but he did a passable job I guess. Kerry didn't offer any specifics about how he was going to all the wonderful things he wants to do, but I didn't expect any in that setting. We'll see if he starts taking a real position on things like Iraq, or just continues to hope that he'll be elected as ABB. I have not warmed to Kerry and I don't know if I will. It seems to me that Kerry should be a lot more than [link|http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Presidential_Tracking_Poll.htm|3 points] ahead at this point. Bush is vulnerable, but Kerry seems unwilling to take a stand on Iraq or trade or the budget or the coming crisis due to baby boomer retirement or ... other than to say he'd do a better job because he spent 5 months in Vietnam 35 years ago while Bush didn't. I don't like his and Edwards' crying about "negative attacks" either. Give me positive attacks! :-/ It sounds like they're afraid of the schoolyard bullies or something. (I'm tempted mention "ass clowns" and insert Danno's closing here...) [link|http://www.seattlewebcrafters.com/php/countdown.php|154 days to go] - I'll let Ashton keep track of the hours. ;-) Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #166,883
7/31/04 1:27:26 PM
|
fuzzy calendar
154 days to the election? I make it closer to ninety and change. Or are these folks privy to some DHS "emergency" planning the rest of us haven't heard about?
cordially,
Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist.
|
Post #166,886
7/31/04 1:51:18 PM
|
Sacre Blue! A bug! 93+ days according to HP-41CX
:-)
That web link actually says -153 days till election day at the moment. There seems to be a bug in that [link|http://www.seattlewebcrafters.com/php/countdown_code.html|PHP code].
[link|http://helios-arts.com/clock.html|This] active election count-down clock seems accurate.
Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #166,889
7/31/04 2:03:38 PM
|
Re: Sacre Blue! etc
Could it be (since you have the trusty HP handy) that they are counting down to the actual (devoutly to be hoped) earliest date for regime change, i.e., 20 January?
cordially,
Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist.
|
Post #166,892
7/31/04 2:58:25 PM
|
Not as I read the code.
// Get server timestamp $today = time();
// Get number of days from today until the end of this year $rest_of_year = date('z', mktime(0,0,0,12,31,date('Y', $today))) - date('z', $today);
// Get number of days from the 1st of 2004 to election day $election = date('z', mktime(0,0,0,11,2,2004));
// Add the days remaining in this year to the number of days in 2004 prior to election day $countdown = $rest_of_year + $election; It seems clear enough that they're making a mistake in the calculation. I think it should be: $countdown = $election - ($length_of_year - $rest_of_year); or more simply: $countdown = $election - $today; (where $length_of_year is calculated using the date function). Checking: July 31 is the 213th day of the year, so 153 days remain (leap year and all that) in the year. Election day is November 2, 306 days from the start of the year and 59 days from the end of the year, so the net is 153 - 59 = 94 days (or 93+ days). To get -153 days, they must have taken 153 - 306 days. The coder apparently got mixed up in knowing whether s/he was counting from the first or the end of the year. Or something like that. Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #166,894
7/31/04 3:17:39 PM
|
Duh
Days between dates is a trivial problem - julday(date2) - julday(date1) - how is it possible to mess this up?
-drl
|
Post #167,046
8/1/04 10:11:26 PM
|
A triumph of algorithm VS adding a few months' days in head
|
Post #167,047
8/1/04 10:13:19 PM
|
Some of us have regressed to ~ 2nd grade in maths. :-(
|