IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / I often don't agree with you - you're politically...
Post #165,942
by CRConrad
7/25/04 4:32:41 PM
Reply
New I often don't agree with you - you're politically...
...a bit too American, and socially too religious, for me to agree with you in those areas -- but then on other stuff (software, economy) I often do.

Only, in the latter cases, what would be the use of YAN "Yeah!" or "Me Too!!!" post? And, in the former... What's the use? Nothing I can say will probably make you See The Light on those issues. ;-/

That's why *I* often don't respond to you -- but rest assured, I read most of what you write, and am glad for the opportunity to. (BTW, that goes for most of you guys I don't regularly respond to... not quite all, but most! :-)

So please, Glen, do keep 'em coming!


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
Post #166,100
by jb4
Picture of jb4
7/26/04 1:49:49 PM
Reply
New Yeah, but by NOT saying anything
we are deprived (or depraved?) of your surgical use of "colorful metaphors"!
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
     A nation of cheaters - (deSitter) - (35) - July 25, 2004, 02:49:13 PM EDT
         Wow! Something we agree on! - (gdaustin) - (33) - July 25, 2004, 04:00:04 PM EDT
             I enjoy your stuff. Just don't have much to say about it. -NT - (Another Scott) - July 25, 2004, 04:06:57 PM EDT
             hang out here, yer fine -NT - (boxley) - July 25, 2004, 04:16:55 PM EDT
             Did someone just write something? - (broomberg) - (6) - July 25, 2004, 04:19:30 PM EDT
                 Gee, thanks. - (inthane-chan) - July 25, 2004, 05:25:15 PM EDT
                 Zymurgy. - (Ashton) - (1) - July 25, 2004, 07:47:24 PM EDT
                     Fermentation? Brewing? Huh? -NT - (broomberg) - July 25, 2004, 09:58:15 PM EDT
                 You forgot someone - yourself - (lincoln) - (2) - July 27, 2004, 07:53:40 PM EDT
                     Troll, thy name is Lincoln ;) - (inthane-chan) - (1) - July 27, 2004, 07:56:20 PM EDT
                         He'd be more tolerable - (lincoln) - July 28, 2004, 07:53:19 PM EDT
             I often don't agree with you - you're politically... - (CRConrad) - (1) - July 25, 2004, 04:32:41 PM EDT
                 Yeah, but by NOT saying anything - (jb4) - July 26, 2004, 01:49:49 PM EDT
             I read all your posts and even agree with some! ;) - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - July 25, 2004, 04:52:46 PM EDT
                 Re: I read all your posts and even agree with some! ;) - (deSitter) - July 25, 2004, 04:57:18 PM EDT
             Re: Wow! Something we agree on! - (Ashton) - July 25, 2004, 08:27:36 PM EDT
             Thanks for the Vote of Confidence Guys... - (gdaustin) - (1) - July 26, 2004, 12:01:21 AM EDT
                 Gonna have to get me a copy of that book - (bepatient) - July 26, 2004, 12:14:13 AM EDT
             Service exists - (tuberculosis) - (15) - July 26, 2004, 12:31:43 AM EDT
                 ICLRPD (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - July 26, 2004, 01:23:38 AM EDT
                 Uh-ohh! Don't give them that one in your C++ class! - (jb4) - (13) - July 26, 2004, 01:53:13 PM EDT
                     There's an A for the student that can make that work ;-) -NT - (tuberculosis) - (12) - July 26, 2004, 01:55:03 PM EDT
                         All they have to do is use a 2.x gcc compiler... - (jb4) - (1) - July 26, 2004, 01:57:58 PM EDT
                             Class compiler is gcc 3.3 -NT - (tuberculosis) - July 26, 2004, 02:10:54 PM EDT
                         Hmm - (deSitter) - (9) - July 26, 2004, 01:59:58 PM EDT
                             It's a sacred token - (jb4) - (1) - July 26, 2004, 05:01:46 PM EDT
                                 self is what all the real OO languages use -NT - (tuberculosis) - July 26, 2004, 06:07:17 PM EDT
                             Dupe...Ignore -NT - (jb4) - July 26, 2004, 05:02:22 PM EDT
                             #define this THIS - (Arkadiy) - (5) - July 26, 2004, 05:13:52 PM EDT
                                 Or for extra emphasis: - (admin) - (1) - July 26, 2004, 05:15:15 PM EDT
                                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk) - July 26, 2004, 09:43:30 PM EDT
                                 That shouldn't be allowed then - (deSitter) - (2) - July 26, 2004, 07:04:00 PM EDT
                                     That's because you've got your #DEFINE statements backwards. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1) - July 26, 2004, 07:12:40 PM EDT
                                         -ugh- -NT - (deSitter) - July 26, 2004, 07:16:55 PM EDT
             Devil in the details tho - (GBert) - July 26, 2004, 08:35:04 AM EDT
         Dunno, Ross. - (imric) - July 26, 2004, 09:10:40 AM EDT

Yeah, baby!
188 ms