IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
News Picks Forum
/
If I may paraphrase you: Love ....... It!
Post #157,354
by
Meerkat
5/28/04 6:47:16 AM
Reply
If I may paraphrase you: Love ....... It!
Actually RF-Tag bullets might be a handy idea...
Two out of three people wonder where the other one is.
Post #157,388
by
boxley
5/28/04 10:09:04 AM
Reply
not hardly
any self respecting human can make their own ammo.
thanx,
bill
Time for Lord Stanley to get a Tan
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
A little Salon *Flash* to remind us
- (
Ashton
)
- (84)
- May 28, 2004, 06:41:46 AM EDT
If I may paraphrase you: Love ....... It!
- (
Meerkat
)
- (1)
- May 28, 2004, 06:47:16 AM EDT
not hardly
- (
boxley
)
- May 28, 2004, 10:09:04 AM EDT
What a load of cr@p.
- (
imric
)
- (81)
- May 28, 2004, 09:30:21 AM EDT
That's one way of looking at it.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (25)
- May 28, 2004, 04:23:51 PM EDT
Put a price tag on it and it's as good as sold...
- (
hnick
)
- May 28, 2004, 05:06:37 PM EDT
Chances of getting filled in here are much lower than there
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- May 28, 2004, 07:41:17 PM EDT
'filled in'?
- (
Silverlock
)
- (1)
- May 28, 2004, 08:08:58 PM EDT
euphemism for getting the crap kicked out of you
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- May 29, 2004, 10:07:27 AM EDT
And how many males have
- (
imric
)
- (20)
- May 29, 2004, 08:09:56 AM EDT
Well, if your characters are so flawed...
- (
CRConrad
)
- (15)
- May 29, 2004, 06:26:27 PM EDT
Did I? As if we stood on a par? No.
- (
imric
)
- (14)
- May 29, 2004, 08:21:15 PM EDT
Re: Did I? As if we stood on a par? No.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (3)
- May 30, 2004, 04:05:17 AM EDT
They do
- (
jake123
)
- (2)
- May 30, 2004, 11:03:35 AM EDT
Wrong guns are designed only to kill humans
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- May 30, 2004, 11:27:12 AM EDT
The answer is "does not approve of any killing"
- (
jake123
)
- May 30, 2004, 11:33:27 AM EDT
Did I? Is that a cogent counter to my argument? No.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (9)
- May 30, 2004, 05:44:42 PM EDT
No it's not enough.
- (
imric
)
- (2)
- May 30, 2004, 07:04:14 PM EDT
You're misunderstanding me completely. (And intentionally?)
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- May 31, 2004, 03:30:50 AM EDT
+ OK...
-NT
- (
imric
)
- May 31, 2004, 03:33:48 AM EDT
the big disconnect between us
- (
boxley
)
- (5)
- May 30, 2004, 07:28:09 PM EDT
He has post Nazi PC disease
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- May 30, 2004, 07:31:55 PM EDT
Oh, POAD, you frigging moron.
- (
CRConrad
)
- May 31, 2004, 03:47:31 AM EDT
You are totally wrong there, Box. (What else is new? :-)
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (2)
- May 31, 2004, 03:44:47 AM EDT
after reading you reply to Imric on why you joined in
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- May 31, 2004, 10:38:54 AM EDT
Sure there is
- (
deSitter
)
- May 31, 2004, 11:01:37 AM EDT
Re: And how many males have
- (
deSitter
)
- (3)
- May 30, 2004, 04:13:58 AM EDT
Top-notch!
- (
Ashton
)
- May 30, 2004, 05:29:10 AM EDT
Wow, an anagram! I guess that proves it then. ;)
-NT
- (
FuManChu
)
- (1)
- May 30, 2004, 02:08:01 PM EDT
There is no doubt
- (
deSitter
)
- May 30, 2004, 02:58:38 PM EDT
So then..EEZ-availability is entirely Irrelevant.___ I see.
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- (54)
- May 28, 2004, 04:55:36 PM EDT
Yes. Coincidental.
-NT
- (
imric
)
- (53)
- May 29, 2004, 08:11:07 AM EDT
"Coincidence"??? Bullpucky!
- (
CRConrad
)
- (52)
- May 29, 2004, 06:49:24 PM EDT
Ill start worrying when my chance of dying by a bullet
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- May 29, 2004, 06:53:05 PM EDT
That's silly.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- May 30, 2004, 04:12:29 AM EDT
ROFL! I wont reduce my risk of puking blood in my own fat
- (
boxley
)
- May 30, 2004, 11:33:25 AM EDT
Re: "Coincidence"??? Bullpucky!
- (
admin
)
- (13)
- May 29, 2004, 06:58:06 PM EDT
Yeah, possible, but I think that's discounted for already.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (2)
- May 29, 2004, 07:04:01 PM EDT
Either way...
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- May 29, 2004, 07:11:11 PM EDT
What do you mean by "problem"?
- (
CRConrad
)
- May 30, 2004, 06:19:00 PM EDT
Nod.
- (
imric
)
- (1)
- May 29, 2004, 08:30:34 PM EDT
Pure Boolean. Again.
- (
Ashton
)
- May 30, 2004, 06:04:17 AM EDT
Oakland calling
- (
rcareaga
)
- (7)
- May 30, 2004, 11:27:01 AM EDT
just be glad they are not using grenades or suicide bombers
- (
boxley
)
- (6)
- May 30, 2004, 11:35:56 AM EDT
Whatever, Box.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (4)
- May 30, 2004, 11:39:09 AM EDT
gee the guy that does that is
- (
boxley
)
- (3)
- May 30, 2004, 11:41:14 AM EDT
I'd say that's part of the problem.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (2)
- May 30, 2004, 08:12:33 PM EDT
Um, I must pick that nit.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- May 30, 2004, 08:38:11 PM EDT
No argument there.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- May 30, 2004, 09:05:22 PM EDT
Private ownership of guns banned in Chicago
- (
lincoln
)
- May 30, 2004, 08:33:17 PM EDT
Guns are not a cause.
- (
imric
)
- (34)
- May 29, 2004, 08:29:31 PM EDT
Computers were designed for things other than virus creation
- (
Meerkat
)
- (27)
- May 29, 2004, 08:45:16 PM EDT
'stuff'?
- (
imric
)
- (26)
- May 29, 2004, 09:07:28 PM EDT
Completely not the point I was trying to get across.
- (
Meerkat
)
- (25)
- May 29, 2004, 09:37:53 PM EDT
Missing mine.
- (
imric
)
- (24)
- May 29, 2004, 09:43:40 PM EDT
Guns like computers are tools
- (
orion
)
- (23)
- May 30, 2004, 01:13:01 AM EDT
Re: Guns like computers are tools
- (
pwhysall
)
- (22)
- May 30, 2004, 04:03:00 AM EDT
You note the futility, but ...
- (
Another Scott
)
- (21)
- May 30, 2004, 12:37:52 PM EDT
Militias != army !=police
- (
imric
)
- (20)
- May 30, 2004, 03:01:44 PM EDT
I can't help it.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (19)
- May 31, 2004, 03:50:47 PM EDT
larn yersel history
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- May 31, 2004, 04:35:51 PM EDT
You want to check those dates again?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- May 31, 2004, 08:04:31 PM EDT
absolute bull puckey from a man who grew up in NC
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- May 31, 2004, 11:27:57 PM EDT
That we would owe to...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- June 1, 2004, 11:24:00 AM EDT
Somewhat OT: a single Frenchman
- (
admin
)
- June 1, 2004, 04:43:40 PM EDT
Sorry. Wrong.
- (
imric
)
- (13)
- May 31, 2004, 07:36:51 PM EDT
Guess again.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (11)
- May 31, 2004, 08:09:23 PM EDT
Yeah, and what other 'perversions' have occured via SC?
- (
imric
)
- (10)
- May 31, 2004, 08:47:29 PM EDT
Who said anything about the Army?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (9)
- May 31, 2004, 11:11:32 PM EDT
Compare 2nd Amendment to VA Bill of Rights from 6/12/1776
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- May 31, 2004, 11:29:04 PM EDT
interesting
- (
jake123
)
- June 1, 2004, 01:20:17 PM EDT
So according to you the supreme court is never wrong?
- (
boxley
)
- May 31, 2004, 11:29:53 PM EDT
Militia
- (
bepatient
)
- (5)
- May 31, 2004, 11:30:25 PM EDT
Did *you* understand the *original* definition?
- (
CRConrad
)
- (4)
- June 1, 2004, 04:31:57 AM EDT
Nice try, but..
- (
Ashton
)
- June 1, 2004, 06:03:54 AM EDT
No.
- (
imric
)
- (1)
- June 1, 2004, 06:27:08 AM EDT
that is a very good point
- (
SpiceWare
)
- June 1, 2004, 09:50:31 AM EDT
Wanna read what started it?
- (
bepatient
)
- June 1, 2004, 02:24:35 PM EDT
Then.. in a Document renowned for its blinding clarity,
- (
Ashton
)
- May 31, 2004, 08:14:34 PM EDT
Re: Guns are not a cause.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- May 30, 2004, 04:11:04 AM EDT
yes they both should be legal and cheap
- (
boxley
)
- May 30, 2004, 11:39:04 AM EDT
They don't have to be. Are you denying they are a means?
- (
CRConrad
)
- (3)
- May 30, 2004, 06:24:58 PM EDT
Patriots. I understand him perfectly.
- (
deSitter
)
- (2)
- May 30, 2004, 06:28:04 PM EDT
Aye.
-NT
- (
imric
)
- May 30, 2004, 07:08:11 PM EDT
Yeah, yeah. All noble sentiments...
- (
CRConrad
)
- May 31, 2004, 03:41:28 AM EDT
i
we
they
.org
Filtering out the sesame seeds.
86 ms