Excuse me?

Post #155,605 by ben_tilly 5/17/04 6:41:25 PM Reply	Excuse me? That's an interesting set of claims. Every one at odds with my understanding and experience. Care to expand on how atheism is a belief system, shares symbols, and has organized congregations? Perhaps it would clarify my position for me to say that atheism is to me no more a religion than monotheism or polytheism are religions. There are many things you could claim to be religions that fall into one of those 3 categories, but the category itself is not a religion. (Some belief systems fall into more than one, for instance wicca arguably falls into all three.) If you have concrete evidence to the contrary, I'd be interested in hearing it. Cheers, Ben To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Post #155,606 by boxley 5/17/04 6:54:30 PM Reply	here ya go [link\|http://www.positiveatheism.org/mail/eml9860.htm\|http://www.positivea.../mail/eml9860.htm] darwin fish, American Atheists congregation symbal and the secular humanists symbol congregations where they worship together [link\|http://www.atheistalliance.org/aai/members.html\|http://www.atheistal.../aai/members.html] belief systems vary by believer just like other organized religons, some are more rabid than others, back when Nick declared himself an atheist and someone like yourself who I would almost hesitate to declare you as an absolute atheist but you clearly can demonstrate all of the rationals used. thanx, bill Time for Lord Stanley to get a Tan questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #155,608 by ben_tilly 5/17/04 7:06:32 PM Reply	I don't consider that example nearly sufficient (new thread) Created as new thread #155607 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=155607\|I don't consider that example nearly sufficient] To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]

Welcome to IWETHEY!