It certainly leave one question unanswered...

Post #152,960 by Simon_Jester 4/28/04 6:48:32 PM Reply	It certainly leave one question unanswered... It is plausable, nay, probable that the Terrorists that have "invaded" Fallujah, have ALWAYS lived there. That Saddam Hussein himself may have had to deal with such Terrorists. Given the: "If the enemy fights from mosques, level the mosques. If they fight from hospitals, gut the hospitals. If they open fire from orphanages, turn them into blackened shells." - isn't it possible that Saddam's mass murder gravesites were the direct result of Saddam's attempts to deal with these Terrorists? Perhaps those mass murder gravesites were justified.
Post #153,001 by rcareaga 4/28/04 10:02:04 PM Reply	Saddam Hussein and the "terrorists" Along these same lines, some bright blogger—I can't, alas, produce a citation—suggested recently, anent the manhandling of our immolated mercenaries last month, that perhaps the deposed president's "tough love" administrative practices, so deplored at the time on these shores, was necessary to keep his depraved and savage subjects in line, and that our best course now might be to apologize, dust him off and re-install him in the office he graced with such distinction for a quarter century, having first secured his promise not in future to invade his neighbors unless to further our strategic objectives, and only then with the personal permission of the Vice President or the Secretary of Defense. A stretch, true, but a more plausible solution to this mess than President Chalabi. cordially, Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist.
Post #153,096 by mmoffitt 4/29/04 1:00:27 PM Reply	Sounds familiar. I heard the same kind of thing after the Soviet Union fell. Went something like, "Well, at least the Bolsheviks kept the Slavs from killing each other." bcnu, Mikem
Post #153,166 by altmann 4/29/04 8:14:22 PM Reply	You just wait till Saddam gets home young man! -- Chris Altmann
Post #153,235 by GBert 4/30/04 1:15:47 PM Reply	Re: Saddam Hussein and the "terrorists" Yes, it's becoming harder and harder to ignore that thought, isn't it? I was trying to say much the same thing [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=152931\|here]. Bill Bennet's gambling addiction doesn't amount to squat compared to W's. I'm not a complete idiot -- some parts are missing
Post #153,262 by Ashton 4/30/04 4:41:36 PM Reply	You'd have to plumb the mind of a Neoconman, (not a very long stick needed for such 'depths') to fully grok why so much of this stuff just goes Z----->ooom, right over their preverted Religio-besotted tiny little imaginations. Empathy is a word they have not ever even heard - for them it is like 'sincerity' [when you can fake that, you've got it Made]. Just look at their eyes, faces: all. dull.. Fortunately, My Gramma taught-by-example just where this kind of mindset leads. Now I have to watch her lesson being taught One More Time. (It won't be enough, either.. such a short attention span -- with All These Toys to mesmerize the sheep, and so effectively, 24/7) Yawn.. reruns are so Boring. Caligula, Bush, Ashcroft, Rove, Wolfie et al - real Bores all. We deserve them, just now. We are Boring. Boring. Bor..

Welcome to IWETHEY!