HALP! Java question MAX_HEAPSIZE=817152000 - (boxley) - (23) - March 26, 2004, 11:29:48 AM EST
         800M? - (Arkadiy) - (22) - March 26, 2004, 11:33:55 AM EST
             hpux on 8400's not intel - (boxley) - (21) - March 26, 2004, 11:47:14 AM EST
                 Not like a stack - (jake123) - (2) - March 26, 2004, 12:20:15 PM EST
                     we are using bea as is the vendor - (boxley) - March 26, 2004, 12:59:45 PM EST
                     Yes, I can tell that you have just taken data structures... - (ben_tilly) - March 26, 2004, 02:17:31 PM EST
                 Java's heap is where all its objects live - (Arkadiy) - (5) - March 26, 2004, 01:33:31 PM EST
                     300M -NT - (boxley) - (4) - March 26, 2004, 01:34:30 PM EST
                         A link found - (Arkadiy) - (3) - March 26, 2004, 01:44:59 PM EST
                             thanks -NT - (boxley) - March 26, 2004, 09:39:26 PM EST
                             that link seemed to have nailed it - (boxley) - (1) - March 29, 2004, 03:47:14 PM EST
                                 Google: Instant Expert-in-a-box -NT - (Arkadiy) - March 29, 2004, 04:02:37 PM EST
                 The heap is the opposite of the stack - (ben_tilly) - (11) - March 26, 2004, 02:10:58 PM EST
                     more an object repository in memory? -NT - (boxley) - (10) - March 26, 2004, 09:40:28 PM EST
                         Not quite - (ben_tilly) - (9) - March 26, 2004, 10:11:04 PM EST
                             the only problem is - (boxley) - (8) - March 26, 2004, 11:01:53 PM EST
                                 I don't know why it would become borked - (ben_tilly) - (7) - March 28, 2004, 02:09:29 AM EST
                                     All of your guesses are for me to follow up - (boxley) - (6) - March 28, 2004, 10:55:33 AM EST
                                         One other thing to follow up on... - (ben_tilly) - (5) - March 29, 2004, 10:36:30 AM EST
                                             That will happen if the heap size is > available memory - (admin) - (2) - March 29, 2004, 10:39:58 AM EST
                                                 Did you read the whole thread, carefully? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 29, 2004, 11:07:42 AM EST
                                                     Nope, but doesn't invalidate my comment. :-) - (admin) - March 29, 2004, 02:22:33 PM EST
                                             playing with slight increments gives mucky mucks heartburn -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 29, 2004, 11:51:48 AM EST
                                                 Stupid muckers - tell them "This is how it's done, so STFU." -NT - (CRConrad) - April 1, 2004, 02:49:50 PM EST