IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New He's still around. He posts on LinuxToday occasionally.
[link|http://linuxtoday.com/search.php3?tbquery=brandioch|Brandioch on LinuxToday].

As for why he's not around here, there were some disagreements about user names and various things, but that was probably just symptoms of the reasons why he left. It's there, in its gory detail, if you want to use the Search function.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who missed him, and many many other old timers...)
New Classic Brandioch
[link|http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2004-02-19-001-26-OP-SW-DV-0007|Here] at LinuxToday:

Monkeys!


[edit - typo. In a 1 word cite. Sheesh!]

Cheers,
Scott.
Expand Edited by Another Scott March 11, 2004, 07:32:54 AM EST
New Re: I miss it - tks for the top-up :-)
New Shurely "Engrish!"
Because that's my excuse for stupid typos from hereon in.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home Page - Now with added Zing!]
     What ever happened to Brandioch a.k.a Kassim - (dmarker) - (13)
         He's still around. He posts on LinuxToday occasionally. - (Another Scott) - (3)
             Classic Brandioch - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 Re: I miss it - tks for the top-up :-) -NT - (dmarker)
                 Shurely "Engrish!" - (pwhysall)
         Quien es el "M" character? - (mmoffitt) - (4)
             My guess: Michel Merlin. Or your guess. -NT - (Yendor) - (3)
                 I miss Michel. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                     :-) - (Another Scott)
                     Re: I miss Michel. - Moi missed him repeatedly - (dmarker)
         Last I talked to him... - (inthane-chan) - (3)
             He's never bothered to email me. - (admin) - (2)
                 Thought he claimed "banishment" - (bepatient) - (1)
                     Right. -NT - (admin)

I think its a fine solution to the problem that you probably shouldn't have.
64 ms