Long term umemployment rises 300 percent 2000 -> 2003 - (deSitter) - (33) - March 7, 2004, 01:39:36 PM EST
         They're not stealing your jobs. - (pwhysall) - (29) - March 7, 2004, 01:51:31 PM EST
             H word again - (deSitter) - (1) - March 7, 2004, 02:45:06 PM EST
                 Never happen. - (pwhysall) - March 7, 2004, 02:48:30 PM EST
             Salary is not negotiable - (tablizer) - (2) - March 7, 2004, 09:04:18 PM EST
                 Exactly - (deSitter) - (1) - March 7, 2004, 09:06:47 PM EST
                     Adam Smith takes vacations -NT - (tablizer) - March 9, 2004, 06:51:14 PM EST
             Of course they aren't stealing our jobs - (orion) - (23) - March 7, 2004, 11:15:45 PM EST
                 Correction. - (inthane-chan) - (22) - March 7, 2004, 11:35:34 PM EST
                     In other parts of the world - (orion) - (21) - March 9, 2004, 02:37:22 AM EST
                         If $2 is a princely sum in Brownpeepulistan... - (pwhysall) - (20) - March 9, 2004, 07:14:59 AM EST
                             Precisely. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 9, 2004, 07:28:39 AM EST
                                 Rejoinder! - (pwhysall) - March 9, 2004, 07:55:08 AM EST
                             I beg to differ - (orion) - (17) - March 10, 2004, 12:34:09 AM EST
                                 Monitoring employees - (ChrisR) - (2) - March 10, 2004, 12:41:43 AM EST
                                     When it's done in secret - (deSitter) - March 10, 2004, 12:48:24 AM EST
                                     There are laws and issues on that very thing - (orion) - March 10, 2004, 11:31:52 AM EST
                                 Re-read my post in context of what matters to Corp USA. -NT - (pwhysall) - (13) - March 10, 2004, 02:03:50 AM EST
                                     What Corp USA thinks is irrelevant - (orion) - (12) - March 10, 2004, 11:33:46 AM EST
                                         You're quite charmingly naive, Norman. -NT - (pwhysall) - (11) - March 10, 2004, 11:51:45 AM EST
                                             You are quite close-minded Peter - (orion) - (10) - March 10, 2004, 12:22:31 PM EST
                                                 Point = missed. -NT - (pwhysall) - (5) - March 10, 2004, 12:53:23 PM EST
                                                     Point == Null - (orion) - (4) - March 10, 2004, 01:22:43 PM EST
                                                         ? - (pwhysall) - (3) - March 10, 2004, 01:39:51 PM EST
                                                             Let us review, shall we? - (orion) - (2) - March 10, 2004, 06:38:40 PM EST
                                                                 Re: Let us review, shall we? - Yes, lets - (jake123) - March 10, 2004, 09:04:20 PM EST
                                                                 Norm, this link might help - (boxley) - March 10, 2004, 11:03:54 PM EST
                                                 Peter is right, you missed the point - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 10, 2004, 03:21:06 PM EST
                                                     The shortest, clearest summary ever. Thank you. -NT - (Arkadiy) - March 10, 2004, 03:27:51 PM EST
                                                     One little tiny correction for you... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - March 10, 2004, 04:38:08 PM EST
                                                         I'm not sure how that one will play out... - (ben_tilly) - March 10, 2004, 05:03:14 PM EST
         That is the flip side of being in a "protected class". - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - March 7, 2004, 05:13:44 PM EST
             Bullsh*t - (deSitter) - (1) - March 7, 2004, 08:09:25 PM EST
                 Note the quotes around protected class. - (a6l6e6x) - March 7, 2004, 10:13:43 PM EST