Are EJBs really this painful? - (ben_tilly) - (15) - March 3, 2004, 01:30:34 AM EST
         AdminiScott's dislike of them seems rather reasonable. -NT - (CRConrad) - March 3, 2004, 02:12:06 AM EST
         Yes ... - (bluke) - (5) - March 3, 2004, 03:03:54 AM EST
             IDE Generating boilerplate - (tuberculosis) - (4) - March 3, 2004, 10:33:40 AM EST
                 Can someone give a good explanation of Home, Remote, etc? - (bluke) - (3) - March 3, 2004, 10:56:50 AM EST
                     It *doesn't* need them. - (admin) - (1) - March 3, 2004, 11:07:32 AM EST
                         I think EJB's came from IBM -NT - (bluke) - March 3, 2004, 12:17:34 PM EST
                     Theoretical distributability - (tuberculosis) - March 3, 2004, 12:01:51 PM EST
         Yes. -NT - (admin) - March 3, 2004, 08:47:29 AM EST
         It's worse - (ChrisR) - March 3, 2004, 01:11:00 PM EST
         They purposely F'd it up to make OO look bad -NT - (tablizer) - (4) - March 3, 2004, 05:27:54 PM EST
             Actually EJB's have little to do with OO - (bluke) - (3) - March 4, 2004, 02:49:04 AM EST
                 So bad that no paradigm wants to claim it? - (tablizer) - (2) - March 4, 2004, 01:58:51 PM EST
                     Huh? Are you making up stuff as you go along, again? - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 4, 2004, 04:29:00 PM EST
                         Old school usenet style. -NT - (jake123) - March 5, 2004, 01:37:31 AM EST
         OK, I get it! - (jb4) - March 4, 2004, 10:41:09 AM EST