IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New You're right...
I was thinking of the parameter passing aspect of PL/SQL (from 7+), not the constructor aspect they added in later on.

You're quite correct also, that I'm thinking of overload rather than polymorphism. I had also switched from Oracle to Java (because I still don't think of PL/SQL as OO language).

I'm not sure that a static factory method would be required in this case for Java, if the constructor can be overloaded to default the values.
New Not required in Java.
The default constructor in Java sets no values at all, in fact.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
     Constructor with 29 parameters - (bluke) - (20)
         **boggle** - (deSitter)
         Depending on the language... - (admin) - (12)
             LRPD - (deSitter)
             This is written in Java - (bluke) - (5)
                 Nasty. -NT - (admin)
                 Brings back bad memories - (deSitter) - (1)
                     Interesting point - (bluke)
                 Re: Is written in Java? - (dlevitt) - (1)
                     Yes, by people with C/C++ (MFC) experience -NT - (bluke)
             Two points - (Simon_Jester) - (4)
                 Re: Two points - well, you're half right. - (admin) - (3)
                     "Static factory methods", constructors - what's the diff? (new thread) - (CRConrad)
                     You're right... - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                         Not required in Java. - (admin)
         29 parameters, all positional? - (ben_tilly) - (1)
             You got it - (bluke)
         Kill the author - (tuberculosis) - (1)
             No one there would understand - (bluke)
         A dictionary array is nice for such -NT - (tablizer)
         Try partial application wrappers? -NT - (FuManChu)

Why does this guitar smell like CHEESE?!?
39 ms