IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Yup, that one
Condolences on having to watch such a play in slo-mo :(

I've learned some quite useful things from your always legible posts. You could probably be a better analyst of [doomed interactions? frequent stupid bizness behaviour?] than most of the overpaid Official peddlers of such nostrums.

And whatever you charged - you'd be cheaper too, as you'd probably choke before ever uttering a Biz-speak TLA, in delivering your analysis. Right?

(But, I bet you'd Hate that, too ;-)

Pity.. that the fallout from and on! someone doing just-this (if I've gleaned anything from zillions of Rorschaks of zIWE bizness enviros, over the years) - is maybe why you would hate it. Few really want that much light shed upon the pet neuroses of the Power folk; never mind any idea of 'improving' such!

Am I right, sir? ... Am I righ...

(10 points for source)
New This one was a killer
He is a decent programmer. Not phenominal, but on the upper bounds of good. He is very good at math, has a math degree, has good visual skills, good presentation, and wanted to be in management.

He had good client interaction skills, decent at teasing out what they really wanted. Good at presenting the solution and getting an agreement of what to do next.

He has 2 mode of operation, though. Micromanage where he lays out the code for you, step by step, or wide open bluesky, figure it out yourself.

When he blueskied, people would get confused. If he didn't take into account certain limitations, or though he did and then didn't communicate well enough how to deal with it, programmers involved in that project would believe him to not understand the difficulties and then would stonewall. He typically DID understand. In my case, when he didn't, I'd corner him for a while, shake it into his head, and then we'd come up with a solution. Other people didn't, so their projects would be more difficult since they didn't have his input when needed.

When he micromanaged, that was a little painful. No 2 coders will code the same way, so when he would layout the underlying data structures of a project, and they did not match how I was designing, none of his input had any value since it was shaped around the data structures. So I'd beat him up to the next level, and we'd work from there.

He was great at working with various departments in the company, finding out how the whole organization would do better, and working in that direction.

But internally, dealing with people who stonewalled or took 10 times to get something right, he could be harsh. Not insulting or abusive. Just short. He hated when people wasted time. Their's or his. He felt the clock ticking away. Deep down, felt it.

But so do I. Time isn't just money. Time is life. If I spend 10 minutes writing this post, I have made a choice to SPEND a limited piece of my life doing it. It is a piece of my life that I will never get back. He felt the same way, that when other people were wasting his time, they were costing him a bit of his life that could be better spent doing something else.

So we got along well. We didn't waste each other's time, we were productive, we got things done, we had fun.

Gonna miss him.
New Thanks
for that irretrievable ten minutes! (Really) er QED

See, your description is clear enough for me to believe I've just seen a - probably as near we get to unbiased description, of some basic strengths/weaknesses - said in useable form.

(And I'd probably miss a cohort of that description, too.. in fact - I do - there was this guy -)

Point: IME, you have an unusual ability to analyze in this way, and also to describe that, sans blab words. I know that I have heard many attempts at 'characterizing' for similar aim: ~just to understand WTF 'is going on with this guy'.?. So I have these horrible examples, for comparison.

If I ran a business, I would prize one with such a skill / talent hugely. Of course, you've shown that you like a different kind of problem, most probably would Not want to play in the human management game (?)

But if you ever burn-out on TB/sec RAID via fibre optics... y'know?
[no flattery intended: simply You're Good at this!]


Ashton
who heard a different Kind of virtuosity last night - wordless. Music!
     Need suggestions, FAST! - (broomberg) - (45)
         Re: Need suggestions, FAST! - (deSitter) - (1)
             Mac/Linux convergence - (cforde)
         google shuttle AMD -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             Why? - (broomberg)
         CDW has IBM Opteron servers. - (Another Scott) - (10)
             Too expensive, wrong type - (broomberg) - (9)
                 But it's got a really ugly case! - (Another Scott)
                 Tiger Direct alternative. - (a6l6e6x)
                 Did you even bother listening? - (deSitter) - (6)
                     Amazing.. - (Ashton) - (5)
                         Context. The whole message. Missed. - (broomberg) - (4)
                             If money is no object - (jake123) - (3)
                                 Agreed - (broomberg) - (2)
                                     Well, when I said AMD64 - (jake123)
                                     You don't want the *Athlon* 64. They're both "AMD64". HTH! -NT - (CRConrad)
         Re: Need suggestions, FAST! - (dmarker) - (8)
             Why would anyone want an Itanium boat anchor these days?!? -NT - (Another Scott) - (7)
                 What do you use for an Opteron compiler? - (admin) - (4)
                     There a bunch of optimizations... - (folkert) - (1)
                         Interesting... thanks. -NT - (admin)
                     Compiler - could this be Greg's "Word on the Street" ? - (CRConrad) - (1)
                         Dern, it got published. I was told it wouldn't. -NT - (folkert)
                 Re: Our ops people looking at them to run Peoplesoft - (dmarker) - (1)
                     otherwise known as fsckthepeoplerus :) -NT - (boxley)
         OH... I just LOVE spending other People Money... - (folkert) - (19)
             Configure it for me! - (broomberg) - (15)
                 Another Try. - (folkert) - (14)
                     No rush - (broomberg)
                     General PS question - - (Ashton) - (2)
                         Yessir... - (folkert) - (1)
                             Followup, Mr. President - - or Andrew? re mobo cap failures (new thread) - (Ashton)
                     Getting there - (broomberg) - (9)
                         Okay... - (folkert) - (8)
                             I think we are done - (broomberg) - (7)
                                 Yup. Done - (broomberg) - (6)
                                     I went to Penguin Computing... - (folkert)
                                     The one you liked working for? - (Arkadiy) - (4)
                                         Yup, that one - (broomberg) - (3)
                                             Re: Yup, that one - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                 This one was a killer - (broomberg) - (1)
                                                     Thanks - (Ashton)
             *splutter!* - (Another Scott)
             Pretty close - (broomberg) - (1)
                 Sane video card == Matrox G550 - (jb4)
         Nice problem to have... -NT - (ben_tilly)

Somebody say, "Co-lom-bo!"
96 ms