So what then makes a whore?
Apparently videotaping oneself with multiple partners having sex does not qualify poor Paris as a whore. Calling such a woman a whore gets me branded as a bigoted-prude? I suppose she is an upstanding citizen and every "not a whore" woman out there video tapes herself having sex multiple times with mutliple partners. Just have to look past the morals and ethics checks on that. Last I checked lust was a sin, but I suppose it is a virtue now?
As for poor Janet, if she was in on the thing, we could classify her as a flasher. If not, it was a wardrobe malfunction and we were supposed to see red lace instead of her breast but Timerlake must have yanked it too hard or something and tore the lace off as well? Just look at the ratings for the whole event. The solar ring is also for sale on the Internet, replica of the one Janet wore. It seems to be selling a lot. In my opinion the whole thing seems like it was staged to get attention and sell that solar ring and boost ratings for the half-time show. Mark my words, someone figured out how to get rich off of the incident.
Edit: I think I should point out that the word Whore is an ambiguous term, and it could have more than one meaning in different contextes. Obviously what I classify as a whore is different from what you classify as a whore. Just like what my country thinks is human rights may differ from what other countries think is human rights. The intense sexual desire for multiple partners and video taping the acts are what makes me think that she is a whore, or at least a exhibitionist, lust definately plays a part here.
