IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Like it!
You've covered mymajor complaints against Micros~1, and more.

One question tho. You're approach doesn't see to protect us agains the "forced march" of upgrades envisioned by .NET. The 5/7 year protection goes a long way toward that, to be sure. But I question whether we're protected against Micros~1 playing licensing games. As I read your enjoinder, Micros~1 might say, "OK, we're 'selling' .NET 2004 for 5 years. So you can license it any time up to 2009. But after 6 months, you have to 'upgrade you license', and oh...hey that'll cost you...."

Thy'd pull a slimy stunt like that, too. (Indeed, some think they're already pulling off a slimy stunt like that!)

Am I missing something?
jb4
(Resistance is not futile...)
New 2 thoughts.
1) I didn't address .NET or other things that might occur, so that's an oversight.

2) I did, and the completely open API specification would take care of that problem. Anybody would be able to write a .NET app, as a result, since they'd be able to "emulate" the API.

The problem with 2 is that likely, there would be some crypto in there that woul d force you to use Windows.

Which means 1) is more likely. :)

Addison
     Remedies - (kmself) - (24)
         Ah - Karsten wants some right-shifting. - (static) - (15)
             How 'bout *FULL* disclosure of the API! -NT - (jb4)
             Being far too specific. - (addison) - (13)
                 Like it! - (jb4) - (1)
                     2 thoughts. - (addison)
                 Two more. - (a6l6e6x)
                 Yes, I had forgotten a lot of those. - (static) - (9)
                     Re: Yes, I had forgotten a lot of those. - (addison) - (1)
                         Oh. I see... - (static)
                     Re: Yes, I had forgotten a lot of those. - (Steven A S) - (6)
                         Re: Yes, I had forgotten a lot of those. - (addison) - (3)
                             Looked at that way - (Steven A S) - (1)
                                 Re: Looked at that way - (addison)
                             It's called 'allocution' - (drewk)
                         Reminds me of a recent joke . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                         Legalese gets tedious. - (static)
         Something involving napalm? -NT - (Silverlock)
         Same as ever, I guess. - (Another Scott)
         I've said this before and I'll say it again - (tjsinclair) - (4)
             How about: Speaker to Slime? - (bbronson) - (3)
                 Actually, as a teacher - (tjsinclair) - (2)
                     /me buys you a beer, it's ok man, somone's gotta do it :) - (Steve Lowe) - (1)
                         Actually, - (tjsinclair)
         Not exactly consensus here. Other MS troubles too: - (Ashton)

What you're selling, I do not need.
47 ms