Nope, she sure didn't.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #139,584

by Nightowl

2/3/04 1:43:12 PM

Nope, she sure didn't.

She claimed today (and last night) that he was only supposed to pull off the leather part, leaving the red lace attached to her costume. However, they are now claiming that the leather pulled the red lace with it, thus exposing her more than she intended to be.

Nightowl >8#

"To become different from what we are, we must have some awareness of what we are."
Eric Hoffer

ok hands up who saw Janets right teat? - (boxley) - (62) - Feb. 1, 2004, 11:01:46 PM EST

On thinking, would a white teat be more objectionable - (boxley) - Feb. 1, 2004, 11:20:32 PM EST

That's a "tit". - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Feb. 1, 2004, 11:22:40 PM EST

like you said, teat :-) -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 2, 2004, 08:20:55 AM EST

No sheat? A tit at the Bowl? Big brown island? -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 1, 2004, 11:25:57 PM EST

CNN has photo or her glaring at Toddlerfake - (deSitter) - Feb. 1, 2004, 11:44:21 PM EST

We did :) - (Nightowl) - (1) - Feb. 1, 2004, 11:27:01 PM EST

And we saw the streaker dancing on the field - (Nightowl) - Feb. 1, 2004, 11:31:18 PM EST

in HD even :) - (SpiceWare) - Feb. 2, 2004, 12:28:55 AM EST

Janet who?? -NT - (cforde) - Feb. 2, 2004, 12:29:50 AM EST

God help me, - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Feb. 2, 2004, 09:43:26 AM EST

not work safe! - (deSitter) - Feb. 2, 2004, 09:55:52 AM EST

I admit I missed the Superbowl - (orion) - Feb. 2, 2004, 11:14:36 AM EST

Just now - (broomberg) - Feb. 2, 2004, 11:07:17 PM EST

Yawn -onlyinMurica - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2004, 11:38:59 PM EST

It's a boob. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2004, 02:48:39 AM EST

Re: It's a boob. - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2004, 03:13:15 AM EST

Here, the boobs were complete. - (imric) - Feb. 3, 2004, 06:42:16 AM EST

This is just plain sicko. - (Andrew Grygus) - (37) - Feb. 3, 2004, 12:26:28 PM EST

Mostly fake outrage - (drewk) - Feb. 3, 2004, 01:20:27 PM EST

Not so much outrage from me - (Arkadiy) - (35) - Feb. 3, 2004, 01:31:56 PM EST

An appropriate quote from Lileks - (Arkadiy) - (31) - Feb. 3, 2004, 01:39:17 PM EST

So WTF is that supposed to mean? - (CRConrad) - (30) - Feb. 4, 2004, 04:22:28 AM EST

Explanations for slow onee - (Arkadiy) - (29) - Feb. 4, 2004, 10:00:06 AM EST

IOW ... - (drewk) - (28) - Feb. 4, 2004, 10:18:15 AM EST

Yes -NT - (Arkadiy) - (27) - Feb. 4, 2004, 10:26:22 AM EST

Bah, you've got no taste. - (pwhysall) - (26) - Feb. 4, 2004, 10:59:35 AM EST

I think it's political - (jake123) - (5) - Feb. 4, 2004, 11:21:36 AM EST

Thanks, you just gave me nightmares for a month - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Feb. 4, 2004, 11:29:22 AM EST

Reminds me of that early scene in Heavy Metal - (jake123) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2004, 11:34:31 AM EST

Once again, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart nails it - (drewk) - Feb. 4, 2004, 11:46:36 AM EST

searches on janet's teat exceed 9/11search engine hits - (boxley) - Feb. 4, 2004, 03:32:19 PM EST

"discrimination" in any nuance - is virtually unMurican.. -NT - (Ashton) - Feb. 4, 2004, 07:36:20 PM EST

Cheap whore has never been my idea - (Arkadiy) - (11) - Feb. 4, 2004, 12:42:09 PM EST

You bigoted prudes are remarkably quick to use that word. - (CRConrad) - (10) - Feb. 4, 2004, 02:16:21 PM EST

Feel free. -NT - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 4, 2004, 02:52:12 PM EST

It sure wasn't me, CRC - (Nightowl) - Feb. 4, 2004, 03:38:53 PM EST

Whores? .. by actual measurement, there are orders/magnitude - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2004, 07:47:31 PM EST

I remember when the word denoted a respected profession - (boxley) - Feb. 4, 2004, 07:52:26 PM EST

So what then makes a whore? - (orion) - (5) - Feb. 5, 2004, 02:30:22 PM EST

Funny how the boob offends... - (pwhysall) - (4) - Feb. 5, 2004, 03:19:27 AM EST

Well that's the whole point - (deSitter) - Feb. 5, 2004, 03:30:57 AM EST

As I said, I never watched the Superbowl - (orion) - (2) - Feb. 5, 2004, 02:26:49 PM EST

It's not ABOUT the Superbowl, dingbat - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2004, 06:27:04 PM EST

OT Nit minor defence - (boxley) - Feb. 5, 2004, 06:38:51 PM EST

I've decided I have to disagree with you - (drewk) - Feb. 4, 2004, 11:00:11 PM EST

Here is a better (looking) handbasket - (Arkadiy) - (6) - Feb. 5, 2004, 08:32:24 AM EST

ROLF!!!!! better looking but (rumored) much more milage -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2004, 10:03:53 AM EST

I did say "yet" - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 5, 2004, 10:37:51 AM EST

Riiiiiight. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 5, 2004, 11:28:12 AM EST

Not tasteful, just better looking -NT - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 5, 2004, 01:18:28 PM EST

Holy G\ufffdtterdammerung, Batman! - (Ashton) - Feb. 5, 2004, 07:29:24 PM EST

baby got back! -NT - (deSitter) - Feb. 5, 2004, 04:02:24 PM EST

Nope, she sure didn't. - (Nightowl) - Feb. 3, 2004, 01:43:12 PM EST

ICLRPD - (jb4) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2004, 01:52:49 PM EST

Re: ICLRPD (new thread) - (jb4) - Feb. 3, 2004, 01:54:10 PM EST

Did anyone notice - (deSitter) - (6) - Feb. 4, 2004, 08:09:04 PM EST

talented and rich, but all tastes are different -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2004, 08:16:18 PM EST

A real woman in world of girlz -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2004, 08:19:04 PM EST

a real woman? Do you know her that well? -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 4, 2004, 08:24:00 PM EST

Personally... - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2004, 08:29:47 PM EST

Island Girls, all natural all the time - (boxley) - Feb. 4, 2004, 08:33:06 PM EST

ICLRPD (new thread) - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 4, 2004, 08:51:56 PM EST

iwethey.org

Denying simple readings of the process.
220 ms