strontium ninety reactors

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #137,739

by boxley

1/25/04 11:06:43 PM

strontium ninety reactors

28 year half life, built small for the cost of 10 years heating/cooling bills can run your house for 27.9 years with enough left over to power back the grid. Airforce has used them since the 60's. About the size of an outhouse.
thanx,
bill

same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned,
Gabriel Dupre

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

Should we redevelop nuclear power? - (deSitter) - (35) - Jan. 25, 2004, 09:51:01 PM EST

Depends. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 25, 2004, 10:28:33 PM EST

'Too cheap to meter' . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - Jan. 25, 2004, 10:59:48 PM EST

Alternative sources of energy - (orion) - (3) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:07:52 PM EST

Landfills - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:14:05 PM EST

Problem with landfills - (orion) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:40:10 PM EST

I'm not saying use it for fuel . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:52:38 PM EST

Re: 'Too cheap to meter' . . . - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:21:00 PM EST

Problems of scale. - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:26:19 PM EST

strontium ninety reactors - (boxley) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:06:43 PM EST

Some pro-nuke information - (deSitter) - Jan. 25, 2004, 11:44:07 PM EST

Re: Should we redevelop nuclear power? NO - (Ashton) - (10) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:22:16 AM EST

Biggest reason for a resounding No Way in Hell! - (Silverlock) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:49:09 AM EST

Re: Biggest reason for a resounding No Way in Hell! - (deSitter) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:59:10 AM EST

Strange - (Silverlock) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 08:17:59 AM EST

There are really no alternatives - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 08:31:38 AM EST

There will be foxhole conversions... - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 26, 2004, 10:55:52 AM EST

You're not looking - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:41:20 PM EDT

Re: There are really no alternatives - in haste - (Ashton) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:17 PM EST

Remember this, you can never put too much water in a nuclear - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 11:05:44 AM EST

Little comparison - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:48:22 PM EST

Point >|< missed - (Ashton) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:28:29 PM EST

'potentially unacceptable consequences' - (Andrew Grygus) - (12) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:13:36 PM EST

ROFL - (deSitter) - (11) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:28:34 PM EST

And in other historic proud moments... - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:55:09 PM EST

Speaking of bombing SC: remember "Special Bulletin"? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:41:46 PM EST

And on that serious note - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:44:13 PM EST

Commercial reactors would be much safer . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:45:03 PM EST

ROFL! - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:54:35 PM EST

Remember flic re nuke sub, ship in 'conflict'? - (Ashton) - (5) - Jan. 27, 2004, 03:51:19 AM EST

The Bedford Incident - (altmann) - Jan. 27, 2004, 04:01:09 AM EST

Hunt For Red October, IIRC. -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2004, 07:28:01 AM EST

Nope. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2004, 11:00:55 AM EST

Definitely "The Bedford Incident" - (rcareaga) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2004, 04:26:32 PM EST

Ah.. "The Bells of St. Mary's" - (Ashton) - Jan. 27, 2004, 08:52:42 PM EST

"Is there any hope for nuclear power?" - (jb4) - Jan. 27, 2004, 06:47:20 PM EST

iwethey.org

They had, like, laser guns that turned people into monkeys. What the hell is that?
104 ms