You and I (at least I think it was you)

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #137,103

by mmoffitt

1/22/04 11:46:29 AM

You and I (at least I think it was you)

have said that before. We (in the US) are being given the benefit of the doubt because the current occupant of the White House was not elected (USSC aside).

I fear that he will be this time though. Which, as depressing a notion as that might be across the pond and to our north, is not nearly as depressing as it is to a lot of us here.

Who could dispute your post? (Except for this nit)

...the US citizenry elects Bush again...

Should read ...the US citizenry elects Bush this time...

they think that a lot of what's going on is a naked executive power grab using 9/11 as the pretext.

I only wish that more than 45-50% of the US populace could see that with the clarity I believe the rest of the world sees it with.

bcnu,
Mikem

I don't do third world languages. So no, I don't do Java.

Post #137,124

by jake123

1/22/04 1:16:08 PM

It would do

if congress and the senate saw it as a power grab.

The election this year is going to be very closely watched all over the world, far more so than usual.

--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

The case for lying (aka State of the Union Address). - (mmoffitt) - (72) - Jan. 21, 2004, 08:51:59 AM EST

Bring it on... - (danreck) - (71) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:09:44 AM EST

Cheney an intellectual? - (mmoffitt) - (66) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:22:01 AM EST

Thank you for proving my point... - (danreck) - (61) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:07:34 PM EST

Here's a few clues for you. - (mmoffitt) - (60) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:00:39 PM EST

Back atcha, Mikey... - (danreck) - (59) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:21:06 PM EST

Litmus test question: - (jb4) - (8) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:50:11 PM EST

Since that subject was brought up in the bowels - (boxley) - (7) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:03:39 PM EST

These people weren't taking flying lessons in '97 - (jb4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:05:19 PM EST

Talking out your ass again - (Silverlock) - (5) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:19 PM EST

the question was whose fault was it bush/clinton - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:51:13 PM EST

If that's how you want to spin it. - (Silverlock) - Jan. 21, 2004, 05:03:42 PM EST

Reading is a skill... - (jb4) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 05:35:12 PM EST

I read it and discarded the "Litmus" test - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 06:43:04 PM EST

Such an easy question; such incredible spin - (jb4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:38:21 AM EST

Yo, read your own links closer. - (mmoffitt) - (49) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:59:31 PM EST

Re: Yo, read your own links closer. - (admin) - (14) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:01 PM EST

Okay, - (mmoffitt) - (13) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:07:14 PM EST

Not AFAIK - (admin) - (12) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:08:36 PM EST

I guess it depends on your definition of "was" ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (11) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:08:58 PM EST

No. - (admin) - (10) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:10:34 PM EST

Yes. - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:13:31 PM EST

No - (drewk) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:16:25 PM EST

Look a couple up - I said "was" - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:19:03 PM EST

Not exactly - (drewk) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:58:04 PM EST

Mea Culpa - should have been "former Rhodes scholar" - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:27:51 PM EST

Much ado about straw- Colossus of Rhodesism - (Ashton) - Jan. 22, 2004, 06:51:17 AM EST

Yep, you're right. - (admin) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:25:55 PM EST

Wouldn't asking Rhodes be the appropriate place - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:27:12 PM EST

Huh? <sarcasm> - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:25:59 PM EST

Chuckle - (Simon_Jester) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:31:08 AM EST

So what? - (deSitter) - (33) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:56:26 PM EST

So what? Indeed. - (mmoffitt) - (32) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:34:56 PM EST

Right. - (bepatient) - (31) - Jan. 21, 2004, 04:27:41 PM EST

One misrepresentation - (jake123) - (30) - Jan. 21, 2004, 04:39:58 PM EST

Doesn't matter... - (Simon_Jester) - (29) - Jan. 21, 2004, 09:47:23 PM EST

This was typical American Statesmanship - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:11:04 PM EST

Certainly, and both sides have been doing it for decades. -NT - (Simon_Jester) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:29:35 AM EST

Riddle me this. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:39:28 AM EST

Abe Lincoln -NT - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:49:36 AM EST

And the lie would be????? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:51:37 AM EST

Re: And the lie would be????? - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:13:25 AM EST

that the South was not entitled to secede -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:14:49 AM EST

That's not what I was ever taught. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:29:08 PM EST

Re: That's not what I was ever taught. - (deSitter) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:39:08 PM EST

Remember the Maine? - (Simon_Jester) - (15) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:48:15 AM EST

A few Nits. (Aside to Box) - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:56:25 AM EST

Alexander Hamilton -NT - (boxley) - (6) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:00:40 PM EST

still waiting - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:13:10 PM EST

Imminent domain dude ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 23, 2004, 09:25:26 AM EST

any minute domain? or did you mean eminent? -NT - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 23, 2004, 09:37:06 AM EST

AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:08:42 AM EST

Eminem domain -NT - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:25:19 AM EST

minimum dolman (who really started hostilities) - (boxley) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:39:44 AM EST

How 'bout Vera Cruz? -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:39:44 PM EST

"See no evil" before Pearl? -NT - (deSitter) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:40:26 PM EST

Again - Not Pre-Emptive War. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 04:42:47 PM EST

Such a simple, clear notion - (Ashton) - Jan. 23, 2004, 05:38:23 AM EST

Re: Again - Not Pre-Emptive War. - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 23, 2004, 05:53:14 AM EST

You keep saying the Irish don't like us any more - (hnick) - (1) - Jan. 23, 2004, 07:45:54 AM EST

Re: You keep saying the Irish don't like us any more - (deSitter) - Jan. 23, 2004, 08:03:48 AM EST

About these replies - (jake123) - (3) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:31:02 AM EST

You and I (at least I think it was you) - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:46:29 AM EST

It would do - (jake123) - Jan. 22, 2004, 01:16:08 PM EST

That is my sense of an attitude towards US persons, thus far - (Ashton) - Jan. 23, 2004, 06:05:30 AM EST

did you watch cheney/lieberman during the last go round? - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:19:15 PM EST

Not Breshnev era, Trotsky ;-) - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:02:42 PM EST

If you watched the VP debates last go round - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:00:39 PM EST

Cheney is not stupid. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:10 PM EST

Re: Bring it on... - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:22:43 AM EST

It the 50 percent of the people who don't vote that - (danreck) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:16:08 PM EST

settle for an amiable rogue? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:22:15 PM EST

A sucklessful candidate? -NT - (danreck) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:32:54 PM EST

iwethey.org

com.yendormike.servlet.disaster.rice.red.bookmark.torture.chinese.commie.java
199 ms